首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Explaining the 'University-run enterprises' in China: A theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China
【24h】

Explaining the 'University-run enterprises' in China: A theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China

机译:解释中国的“大学办企业”:发展中国家大学与产业关系的理论框架及其在中国的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper explains and evaluates the evolution of the UREs (University-run Enterprises) in China by building a new theoretical framework on the university-industry relationship. Unlike the Triple Helix or the New Economics of Science that advocates a certain type (integration or separation) of university-industry relationship, we take a contingent or context-specific perspective on the relationship, having the context of developing countries in mind. The framework developed in this paper explains in what condition universities would keep distance from industry or become entrepreneurial to take a part in the functions of industry (i.e. setting up and running their own business enterprises). In this typology the basic determinants are internal resources of university, absorptive capacity of industrial firms and existence of intermediary institutions, as well as the propensity of university for UREs. The paper has argued that the Chinese universities since the market-oriented reform had strong propensity to pursue economic gains and strong internal (R&D and other) resources to launch start-ups, and thus established their own firms (i.e. UREs), given the low absorptive capacity of industrial firms and the underdeveloped intermediary institutions. The recent adjustment of the UREs in China can also be understood in terms of changes in the above three factors, such as universities' weakened propensity to pursue economic gains, relative decline of superiority of university resources, and improved external environment. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文通过建立新的大学与产业关系的理论框架,来解释和评估中国大学(UREs)的发展。与提倡某种特定类型(整合或分离)的大学与产业之间的关系的“三重螺旋”或“新科学经济学”不同,我们在考虑到发展中国家的情况下,对这种关系采取了偶然性或特定于上下文的观点。本文开发的框架说明了大学在什么情况下会与行业保持距离或成为企业家以参与行业的功能(即建立和运营自己的商业企业)。在这种类型中,基本决定因素是大学的内部资源,工业企业的吸收能力和中介机构的存在以及大学对UREs的倾向。该论文认为,自市场化改革以来,中国大学具有很强的追求经济利益的倾向,并且拥有强大的内部(研发和其他)资源来创办初创企业,因此在低收入的情况下建立了自己的公司(即UREs)。工业企业和不发达的中介机构的吸收能力。可以从上述三个因素的变化来理解中国最近对UREs的调整,例如大学追求经济利益的倾向减弱,大学资源优势的相对下降以及外部环境的改善。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号