首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Limits to database protection: Fair use and scientific research exemptions
【24h】

Limits to database protection: Fair use and scientific research exemptions

机译:数据库保护的局限性:合理使用和科学研究豁免

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A trend running diametrically opposed to the expansion of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is the increasing awareness that dominant positions sustained by IPR may be mitigated through exemptions and statutory or compulsory licences. It is argued that there are compelling economic reasons to protect valuable assets that are prone to copying, but that there are equally compelling reasons to limit monopolistic claims and stimulate cross-licensing practices. Compulsory licensing may serve as a stimulus to the bargaining process with private parties and research institutions alike. Another important category of information is public sector information. Access to information has become a concern and the European Commission has followed up on its Green Paper on Public Sector Information in the Information Society, with a Directive implementing its vision on affordable access for all and exploitation potential. The right of access to information may be enforced through the European Convention on Human Rights. It not only guarantees the freedom of speech, it also recognises the freedom to receive information. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:与知识产权(IPR)的扩张截然相反的趋势是,人们越来越意识到,可以通过豁免和法定或强制性许可来减轻知识产权所维持的主导地位。有人认为,有令人信服的经济原因来保护易于复制的贵重资产,但同样有令人信服的理由来限制垄断要求并刺激交叉许可实践。强制许可可能会刺激私人团体和研究机构之间的讨价还价过程。信息的另一重要类别是公共部门信息。信息获取已成为人们关注的问题,欧洲委员会对《信息社会公共部门信息绿皮书》进行了跟进,该指令实施了其关于所有人都能负担得起的获取和利用潜力的愿景。信息获取权可以通过《欧洲人权公约》强制执行。它不仅保证了言论自由,还承认了接收信息的自由。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号