首页> 外文期刊>Research in Higher Education >Measuring Teaching Effectiveness: Correspondence Between Students’ Evaluations of Teaching and Different Measures of Student Learning
【24h】

Measuring Teaching Effectiveness: Correspondence Between Students’ Evaluations of Teaching and Different Measures of Student Learning

机译:衡量教学效果:学生对教学的评价与学生学习的不同措施之间的对应关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Relating students’ evaluations of teaching (SETs) to student learning as an approach to validate SETs has produced inconsistent results. The present study tested the hypothesis that the strength of association of SETs and student learning varies with the criteria used to indicate student learning. A multisection validity approach was employed to investigate the association of SETs and two different criteria of student learning, a multiple-choice test and a practical examination. Participants were N = 883 medical students, enrolled in k = 32 sections of the same course. As expected, results showed a strong positive association between SETs and the practical examination but no significant correlation between SETs and multiple-choice test scores. Furthermore, students’ subjective perception of learning significantly correlated with the practical examination score whereas no relation was found for subjective learning and the multiple choice test. It is discussed whether these results might be due to different measures of student learning varying in the degree to which they reflect teaching effectiveness.
机译:将学生的教学评估(SET)与学生的学习联系起来,以验证SET的方法产生了不一致的结果。本研究检验了以下假设:SET与学生学习的关联强度随用于指示学生学习的标准而变化。采用了多部分效度方法来研究SET与两个不同学生学习标准,多项选择测试和实践考试的关联。参加者为N = 883名医学生,参加了同一课程的k = 32个部分。正如预期的那样,结果显示SET与实际考试之间存在很强的正相关性,但SET与多项选择考试成绩之间没有显着相关性。此外,学生对学习的主观感知与实际考试成绩显着相​​关,而主观学习和多项选择测验则没有关系。讨论了这些结果是否可能是由于学生对学习效果的不同衡量程度所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号