首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >State of the art review of the environmental assessment and risks of underground geo-energy resources exploitation
【24h】

State of the art review of the environmental assessment and risks of underground geo-energy resources exploitation

机译:环境评估和地下地球能源开发风险的最新技术回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Geo-resources play an increasing significant role in achieving a sustainable energy future. However, their exploitation is not free of environmental impacts. This paper aims to identify the lessons and knowledge gaps on understanding of the sources, mechanisms and scope of environmental consequences of underground geoenergy resources exploitation. The paper examines four underground exploitation activities: CO2 geological storage, exploitation of shale gas, geothermal power and compressed air energy storage (CAES). Selected studies carrying out life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental risk assessment (ERA) are structurally reviewed by applying a six steps method. Our finding indicates that global warming potential is the major focus of examined LCA studies with relatively less attention on other impacts. Environmental impacts at the local level are less evaluated except water use for shale gas and geothermal power. Environmental impacts of exploitation with storage purposes are relatively low. For energy supply associated exploitation, the impacts largely depend on the types of underground activities and the exploited energy carriers. In the ERA studies, likelihood of a hazard occurrence is the focus of the probability assessment. There is limited information on the pathways and transport of hazard agents in the subsurface and on the relation between hazard exposure and the impacts. The leakage of the storing agents is the well-identified hazard for storage associated exploitation, while the migration of fluids and exploited energy carriers are the ones for exploitation with energy supply purposes. In general, understanding of environmental risks of soil contamination are limited. Very few number of ERA studies are available for assessing a CAES. Our research points out the need for developing a framework which allows the integration between LCA and ERA in subsurface environmental management.
机译:地理资源在实现可持续能源的未来中起着越来越重要的作用。但是,他们的开采并非没有环境影响。本文旨在确定在理解地下地质能源开发的环境后果的来源,机理和范围方面的经验教训和知识差距。本文研究了四个地下开采活动:CO2地质封存,页岩气开采,地热发电和压缩空气储能(CAES)。通过应用六步法,对进行生命周期评估(LCA)和环境风险评估(ERA)的部分研究进行结构审查。我们的发现表明,全球变暖潜力是LCA研究的主要重点,而对其他影响的关注相对较少。除用于页岩气和地热发电的用水外,对当地环境影响的评估较少。以储存为目的的开采对环境的影响相对较低。对于与能源供应相关的开采,影响很大程度上取决于地下活动的类型和被开采的能源载体。在ERA研究中,危险发生的可能性是概率评估的重点。关于地下危险物的途径和运输以及危险暴露与影响之间的关系的信息有限。储存剂的泄漏是与储存相关的开采的众所周知的危害,而流体和被开采的能量载体的迁移是出于能源供应目的而开采的危险。通常,对土壤污染的环境风险的了解是有限的。很少有ERA研究可用于评估CAES。我们的研究指出需要开发一种框架,该框架允许在地下环境管理中实现LCA和ERA之间的集成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号