首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Renewable electricity support systems: Are feed-in systems taking the lead?
【24h】

Renewable electricity support systems: Are feed-in systems taking the lead?

机译:可再生电力支持系统:馈电系统是否处于领先地位?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Support systems for renewable-energy-sourced electricity (RES-E) can be classified into price- and quantity based systems. Their most representative instruments are feed-in systems (price-based) and quota systems, e.g. green certificates or a Renewable Portfolio Standard (quantity-based). The origins of these support systems are quite different and are motivated by different political and economic needs. Likewise their geographical distribution and effectiveness also differ. Worldwide feed-in systems are the most widespread RES-E support system. In recent years, some classical quota countries have partially (or even totally) changed to feed-in systems. Feed-in systems seem to encourage higher RES-E deployment, technology diversity and investor security. Although the manufacturing capacity for certain RES-E technologies has been more developed in some feed-in countries, lately this has changed to some extent due to the incorporation of emerging countries in the RES-E industry. Traditionally, quota systems appeared to be more compatible with liberalisation of the electricity market. However, since the introduction of the premium system, this argument can be countered, since feed-in premiums can be considered compatible with the electricity market as quota systems. Regarding the price paid for RES-E in quota-countries, higher green certificate prices have not led to higher RES-E quantities. Moreover, the relative support levels in quota-countries are higher on average than in FIT-countries, contradicting the common argument that quota systems are more cost effective. Additionally, feed-in systems, especially if stepped tariffs are designed, encourage higher RES-E geographical dispersion; avoiding the concentration of RES-E facilities in just a few locations, which can lead to NIMBY -Not In My Back Yard- syndrome. All these factors may explain the steady spread of feed-in systems worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to assess the performance of quota and feed-in systems, thereby contributing to the worldwide debate on the suitability of the different RES-E support systems.
机译:可再生能源电力支持系统(RES-E)可以分为基于价格和数量的系统。它们最具代表性的工具是馈电系统(基于价格)和配额系统,例如绿色证书或可再生能源投资组合标准(基于数量)。这些支持系统的起源是完全不同的,并且受到不同的政治和经济需求的驱动。同样,它们的地理分布和有效性也不同。全球馈电系统是最广泛的RES-E支持系统。近年来,一些经典配额国家已部分(或什至全部)更改为固定配额制。馈电系统似乎鼓励更高的RES-E部署,技术多样性和投资者安全性。尽管某些馈电国家已经提高了某些RES-E技术的制造能力,但由于新兴国家将其纳入RES-E行业,这种情况在最近有所改变。传统上,配额制度似乎与电力市场的开放更加兼容。但是,由于引入了保险费制度,因此可以反驳这一论点,因为上网电价保险费可以被视为与电力市场兼容的配额制度。关于配额国家为RES-E支付的价格,较高的绿色证书价格并未导致RES-E数量增加。此外,配额国家的相对支持水平平均要高于信托基金国家,这与普遍的观点有关,即配额制度更具成本效益。此外,馈电系统,特别是如果设计了阶梯式关税的情况,会鼓励更高的RES-E地理分布;避免将RES-E设施集中在几个地方,这可能会导致NIMBY-Not In My Back Yard- syndrome。所有这些因素都可以解释馈电系统在全球范围内的稳步普及。本文的目的是评估配额和馈入系统的性能,从而有助于就各种RES-E支持系统的适用性展开全球性辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号