...
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >A posteriori clear-sky identification methods in solar irradiance time series: Review and preliminary validation using sky imagers
【24h】

A posteriori clear-sky identification methods in solar irradiance time series: Review and preliminary validation using sky imagers

机译:太阳辐照时间序列中的后验晴空识别方法:使用天空成像仪进行审查和初步验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines all known methods that have been proposed in the literature to identify clear-sky periods in historical solar irradiance time series. Two different types of clear-sky detection (CSD) methods are discussed: those (16 total) that attempt to isolate periods of 1-min or more cloudless conditions, and those (5 total) that only attempt to detect clear-sun periods. All methods are found to rely on a diversity of inputs and on a variety of tests that typically examine the smoothness of the temporal variation of global and/or direct irradiance. Using samples of a few days with variable cloudiness, it is shown that these methods all have obvious strengths and weaknesses. Although this justifies a detailed validation to determine which method(s) could be best suited in the practice of solar radiation modeling or other applications, the current lack of appropriate equipment at high-quality reference radiometric stations prevents such an endeavor. Only a preliminary study is conducted here at seven stations of the SURFRAD network in the U.S., where 1-min irradiance measurements are available, along with sky data from a Total Sky Imager (TSI). The many limitations of the latter prevent its data to be considered "ground truth" here. Nevertheless, the comparison of the results from all CSD methods and 1.2 million TSI observations from all SURFRAD sites provides important qualitative and quantitative information, using a variety of performance indicators. Overall, two CSD methods appear more robust and are recommended, pending better high-resolution and high-performance cloud observations from modern sky cameras to redo these tests.
机译:这项研究检查了文献中提出的所有已知方法,以确定历史太阳辐照时间序列中的晴空时期。讨论了两种不同类型的晴空检测(CSD)方法:尝试隔离1分钟或更长时间的无云状况的方法(总共16种)和仅尝试检测晴天的方法(总共5种)。发现所有方法都依赖于输入的多样性和各种测试,这些测试通常检查全局和/或直接辐照度的时间变化的平滑度。使用几天的云量可变的样本表明,这些方法都有明显的优点和缺点。尽管这证明了进行详细的验证以确定哪种方法最适合进行太阳辐射建模或其他应用的做法是正确的,但是目前在高质量参考辐射站缺少适当设备的情况阻止了这种努力。在这里,仅对美国SURFRAD网络的七个站点进行了初步研究,这些站点可进行1分钟的辐照度测量以及来自Total Sky Imager(TSI)的天空数据。后者的许多局限性使其无法在此处将其数据视为“基本事实”。尽管如此,所有CSD方法的结果与SURFRAD所有站点的120万个TSI观测结果的比较,都使用各种性能指标提供了重要的定性和定量信息。总体而言,建议使用两种CSD方法,这些方法要更健壮并值得推荐,然后再通过现代空中摄像机进行更好的高分辨率和高性能云观测,以重做这些测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号