首页> 外文期刊>Reference reviews >Abolition and Anti-slavery: A Historical Encyclopedia of the American Mosaic
【24h】

Abolition and Anti-slavery: A Historical Encyclopedia of the American Mosaic

机译:废除与反奴隶制:美国马赛克的历史百科全书

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The long saga of slavery and its abolition is one of the best studied and most disputed subjects in American history. But one wonders how important the abolition movement was in bringing slavery to an end. To explore that, I feel a great need for some context before we discuss the work in hand - in particular an examination of what the historians have said about it. For Ulrich Bonnell Phillips, writing in American Negro Slavery (1918), slavery was a much needed "civilising" force for black people. It offered them good conditions, necessary social controls and a broadly constructive relationship with whites. But it was an economic failure and headed for collapse even without abolition. As a southerner (born in 1877 of a plantation mother), Phillips' bias comes as no surprise. Ellis Merton Coulter writing in the 1950s was a frank apologist for the unreconstructed south: for secession, segregation and the whole apparatus of Jim Crow. Neither saw the abolitionists as a force for good.
机译:奴隶制的长期传奇及其废除是美国历史上研究得最好,争议最大的主题之一。但有人想知道,废除奴隶制对于结束奴隶制有多么重要。为了探索这一点,在我们讨论手头的工作之前,我感到非常需要某种背景,尤其是对历史学家对此事的评论。对于乌尔里希·邦内尔·菲利普斯(Ulrich Bonnell Phillips)在《美国黑人奴隶制》(1918年)中的写作而言,奴隶制是黑人急需的“文明”力量。它为他们提供了良好的条件,必要的社会控制以及与白人的广泛建设性关系。但这是经济上的失败,即使不废除,也可能走向崩溃。作为一名南方人(出生于1877年,一位种植园母亲),菲利普斯的偏见也就不足为奇了。埃利斯·默顿·库尔特(Ellis Merton Coulter)在1950年代的写作是坦率的道歉。双方都没有把废奴主义者看作是永远的力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号