首页> 外文期刊>Reading and Writing >Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: syntactic complexity and genre differentiation
【24h】

Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: syntactic complexity and genre differentiation

机译:从三年级到七年级的四种类型的写作发展:句法复杂性和类型差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two measures of syntactic complexity, clauses per T-unit and words per clause, were used to examine differences among four genres of text—narrative, descriptive, compare/contrast, and persuasive—written by the same two cohorts (83 students in grades three and five and 96 students in grades five and seven) on two occasions 2 years apart as part of a larger longitudinal study. For clauses per T-unit, a measure of subordination, significant differences were found between persuasive essays, which had more subordinate clauses, and the other three genres. For words per clause, an indicator of the denser syntax of the academic register, significant differences were found between descriptive texts, which had more words per clause than the persuasive essays, which did not differ from the compare/contrast texts. Over the grade levels studied, the measures of syntactic complexity did not increase in their differentiation among the four genres. The two measures of syntactic complexity were negatively correlated, especially for the persuasive essays. For text length, which is thought to reflect compositional fluency, grade, genre, and grade × genre effects were significant for both cohorts. Post hoc analyses found few examples of the syntax-level structures characteristic of the academic register. These findings suggest that although students could produce each kind of genre, their ability to do so may have been compromised by their limited knowledge of the syntactic structures required to achieve text-level genre goals. Researchers and educators should consider the syntactic- and text-level requirements for different school-based genres in designing and evaluating writing instruction.
机译:两种句法复杂性度量(每个T单元的子句和每个子句的单词)被用来检验同一组的四组文字(叙述,描述,比较/对比和说服力)之间的差异(三年级的83名学生)五年级和七年级的五名学生和96名学生)两次分开两次,作为较大的纵向学习的一部分。对于每个从属单位的从句,这是一种从属度量,在具有更多从属从句的说服性论文与其他三种体裁之间发现了显着差异。对于每个子句的单词,这是学术记录语法更密集的指示,在描述性文本之间发现了显着差异,描述性文本的每个子句比说服性文章多,而与比较/对比文本没有区别。在所研究的年级水平上,语法复杂性的量度在四种类型之间的差异没有增加。句法复杂性的两种度量是负相关的,特别是对于有说服力的文章。对于认为能反映构图流畅度的文本长度,两个队列的成绩,等级,体裁和等级×体裁效果均显着。事后分析发现,学术教科书的语法级结构特征很少见。这些发现表明,尽管学生可以产生各种体裁,但他们对实现文本级体裁目标所需的句法结构的了解有限,可能会损害他们的能力。研究人员和教育工作者在设计和评估写作指导时应考虑不同校本体裁的句法和文本级别要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号