首页> 外文期刊>The rand journal of economics >Sender or receiver: who should pay to exchange an electronic message?
【24h】

Sender or receiver: who should pay to exchange an electronic message?

机译:发件人或收件人:谁应该付费来交换电子信息?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the pricing implications of call externalities, the benefits enjoyed by the recipient of a message sent by another user. We show that, with or without a network-profitability constraint, efficient pricing requires consideration of demands, as well as costs. We present conditions under which equal charges for sending and receiving calls maximize welfare and profits. We also present conditions under which the receiving party's subsidizing the sender maximizes welfare andprofits. Finally, we show that menus of pricing options can increase welfare and profits. None of these findings holds in the absence of call externalities.
机译:我们研究了呼叫外部性对价格的影响,即另一用户发送的消息的接收者所享有的收益。我们表明,无论有无网络盈利能力约束,有效定价都需要考虑需求以及成本。我们提出了这样的条件,在这种条件下,发送和接听电话的相等费用将使福利和利润最大化。我们还提出了条件,在这种条件下,接收方对发送方的补贴将使福利和利润最大化。最后,我们证明了定价选项菜单可以增加福利和利润。在没有呼叫外部性的情况下,这些发现均不成立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号