首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Preliminary reassessment of the Aurignacian in Banat (South-western Romania)
【24h】

Preliminary reassessment of the Aurignacian in Banat (South-western Romania)

机译:巴纳特(罗马尼亚西南部)的奥里尼亚克人的初步评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite its richness, the Romanian Paleolithic record has remained for decades relatively poorly known to the broader scientific community. The situation swiftly changed after the find at Oase Cave, which brought the Romanian paleoanthropological and archeological record into intensive focus, spurring several international research projects devoted to the regional Early Upper Paleolithic. The present paper provides the first summary of recent research undertaken in the neighboring area of Oase, the Romanian Banat, particularly focused on the Aurignacian open air occupation at Cosava. A detailed attribute analysis of both old and recently excavated Aurignacian collections from Cosava, supplemented by a comparative overview of the allegedly similar industry at Romanesti-Dumbravita, is presented. An initial chronological assessment of the Banat Aurignacian by means of several OSL samples from Romanesti is also proposed. The results of the lithic analysis, much like the new chronological estimations (in excess of 30 ka BP) confirm the early assignment of the Banat assemblages to the Krems-type Aurignacian, but also dismiss the unusually young chronology initially attributed to these settlements. While several features, including the constant presence of Krems/Dufour tools, point strongly to an archaic stage of the Aurignacian technocomplex (Protoaurignacian/Aurignacian 0), other elements (carinated forms, twisted bladelets, and Aurignacian blades) recall more 'classical' features conventionally associated to the Aurignacian Ⅰ. No coherent chrono-stadial trend or functional requirements can explain these 'mixed' features in the Banat industries with the data at hand. Their presence nevertheless points to the internal variability of these early Aurignacian occurrences.
机译:尽管内容丰富,但罗马尼亚旧石器时代的记录在几十年来一直为广大科学界所知。在Oase Cave的发现之后,情况迅速改变,这使罗马尼亚的古人类学和考古记录成为人们关注的焦点,从而刺激了一些致力于早古石器时代地区的国际研究项目。本文提供了在Oase的邻近地区罗马尼亚Banat进行的近期研究的第一份摘要,特别是针对Cosava的Aurignacian露天占领。提供了对科萨瓦的旧和最近发掘的奥里尼亚克收藏品的详细属性分析,并补充了对Romanesti-Dumbravita所谓的类似行业的比较概述。还提出了利用Romanesti的一些OSL样本对Banat Aurignacian进行初步年代评估的方法。岩性分析的结果与新的年代学估算(超过30 ka BP)很像,证实了巴纳特组合的早期分配是克雷姆斯型奥里尼亚克人,但也忽略了最初归因于这些聚落的异常年轻的年代学。虽然包括Krems / Dufour工具的不断出现在内的几个功能强烈地指向了Aurignacian技术复合体的原始阶段(Prouaurignacian / Aurignacian 0),但其他元素(carinated形式,扭曲的小叶片和Aurignacian刀片)却让人想起了更多的“经典”功能按惯例与奥里尼亚克一世有关。没有连贯的时态趋势或功能需求可以用现有数据解释巴纳特工业中的这些“混合”特征。然而,它们的存在表明了这些早期奥里尼亚克事件的内部变异性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2014年第17期|193-212|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology, University of Cologne, Weyertal 125, 50923 Koeln, Germany;

    Crimean Branch of the Institute of Archeology, National Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (NUAS), Yaltinskaya Street 2, 95007 Simferopol, Ukraine;

    Department of History and Letters, Faculty of Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, Str. Lt. Stancu Ion 35, 130115 Targoviste, Romania;

    Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology, University of Erlangen, Kochstrasse 4/18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;

    Department of Geography, RWTH Aachen University, Germany;

    Department of History and Letters, Faculty of Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviste, Str. Lt. Stancu Ion 35, 130115 Targoviste, Romania;

    Heritage Advice S.R.L., Str. Nicolae Titulescu 1, 280/B/63, 510096 Alba Iulia, Romania;

    Crimean Branch of the Institute of Archeology, National Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (NUAS), Yaltinskaya Street 2, 95007 Simferopol, Ukraine;

    Str. Tineretului 4, 29/D/80, 130073 Targoviste, Romania;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号