首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Chemical discrimination of obsidian sources in the Kirigamine area and provenance analysis of obsidian artifacts from the Hiroppara prehistoric sites I and II, central Japan
【24h】

Chemical discrimination of obsidian sources in the Kirigamine area and provenance analysis of obsidian artifacts from the Hiroppara prehistoric sites I and II, central Japan

机译:日本中部平谷地区黑曜石来源的化学鉴别和黑曜石文物的来源分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemical discrimination of obsidian sources and chemical classification of obsidian artifacts is an essential tool for studying the provenance of obsidian artifacts. The Hiroppara prehistoric sites (I and II) are associated with a cluster of obsidian sources within the Kirigamine area (Nagano Prefecture), central Japan. More than 1000 obsidian artifacts were recovered during excavations in 2011-2013. Here, we conduct a provenance analysis for these obsidian artifacts using Wavelength and Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (WDXRF and EDXRF, respectively). Quantitative, destructive WDXRF analysis on geological obsidian samples reveals that the Kirigamine obsidian sources can be classified into 12 geochemical groups. Qualitative EDXRF analysis of these geological obsidians samples can also discriminate these 12 chemical groups. To test the reliability of the EDXRF approach, which is non-destructive and rapid, for provenancing obsidian artifacts, we selected 40 obsidian artifacts and compared EDXRF and WDXRF measurements. The results obtained by WDXRF method achieved a success rate of 93% (37 samples) compared to 65% (26 samples) by the EDXRF method. The EDXRF results from four samples are inconsistent with the results from the WDXRF data. While the non-destructive EDXRF method is straightforward and convenient it is evidently less reliable than the destructive WDXRF method. With these results in mind, we performed provenance analysis for all obsidian artifacts (689 samples) from Hiroppara site I using the EDXRF method, and successfully classified 60% of the analyzed artifacts (411 samples). The majority of these samples (352 samples) identify with the Higashimochiya and Takayama sources. Additional information about morphological features, including texture, shape, color, and transparency of samples, can improve the discrimination that is possible by chemical analysis alone. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:黑曜石来源的化学鉴别和黑曜石制品的化学分类是研究黑曜石制品来源的重要工具。 Hiroppara史前遗址(I和II)与日本中部Kirigamine地区(长野县)的黑曜石源群相关。在2011-2013年的挖掘过程中,发现了1000多个黑曜石文物。在这里,我们使用波长和能量色散X射线荧光(分别为WDXRF和EDXRF)对这些黑曜石文物进行物源分析。对地质黑曜石样品进行定量,破坏性的WDXRF分析后发现,桐木黑曜石来源可分为12个地球化学组。这些地质黑曜石样品的定性EDXRF分析也可以区分这12个化学族。为了测试EDXRF方法的可靠性(该方法无损且快速),可用于证明黑曜石假象,我们选择了40个黑曜石假象,并比较了EDXRF和WDXRF测量值。通过WDXRF方法获得的结果成功率为93%(37个样本),而通过EDXRF方法获得的成功率为65%(26个样本)。四个样本的EDXRF结果与WDXRF数据的结果不一致。尽管非破坏性EDXRF方法简单,方便,但显然不如破坏性WDXRF方法可靠。考虑到这些结果,我们使用EDXRF方法对Hiroppara站点I的所有黑曜石文物(689个样本)进行了物源分析,并成功分类了60%的分析文物(411个样本)。这些样品中的大多数(352个样品)都与Higashimochiya和Takayama的来源一致。有关形态特征的其他信息(包括样品的质地,形状,颜色和透明度)可以改善仅通过化学分析即可实现的辨别力。 (C)2017爱思唯尔有限公司和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号