...
首页> 外文期刊>Quantitative marketing and economics >Is online newspaper advertising cannibalizing print advertising?
【24h】

Is online newspaper advertising cannibalizing print advertising?

机译:在线报纸广告会蚕食平面广告吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

During the past decade, the newspaper industry experienced significant erosion of revenues, predominantly in print advertising. The concomitant increase in the less rewarding online advertising has been unable to make up for this loss. As a result, for every $ 1 increase in online advertising between 2005 and 2011, newspapers lost $ 22 in print advertising. While it is conceivable that the overall change in the advertising landscape (such as the growth of targeted search advertising), contributed to the decline in print advertising, it is not clear whether the growth in online newspaper advertising aggravated or alleviated this global trend. We investigate this concern by studying how advertisers reallocate their media budgets over time between the online and print media within a newspaper. We perform our empirical analysis using unique panel data on account-level advertising expenditures in a Top 50 US newspaper from 2005 through 2011. After accounting for cross-sectional heterogeneity among advertisers and some factors that possibly drove both print and online newspaper advertising, we find a negative relationship between the ad spending in these two media options. Therefore, advertisers exhibit a higher propensity to decrease print spending when they increase their online spending compared to the scenario when online spending either remains unchanged or even decreases. Since we do not rely on exclusion restrictions, we cannot rule out residual factors that drove both print and online advertising and thus contaminated this relationship. However, such potentially confounding factors (e.g., change in total media budget) are likely to have induced a positive correlation between print and online advertising. Therefore, the negative relationship that we recover is suggestive of advertisers perceiving print and online newspaper advertising as substitutes. This, in turn, implies that the growth in online newspaper advertising exacerbated the overall decline in print advertising. Overall, we attribute 7-17 % of the decline in print newspaper advertising revenues between 2005 and 2011 to the growth of online newspaper advertising. We conclude that cannibalization should be a credible consideration in the marketing decisions of the newspaper. However, since a large portion of print advertising revenue decline also occured for advertisers who never purchased online advertising from the newspaper, cannibalization within the newspaper is not solely responsible for the downward trajectory of print advertising.
机译:在过去的十年中,报纸行业的收入大幅下降,主要是印刷广告。报酬较低的在线广告的随之增加无法弥补这一损失。结果,2005年至2011年间,在线广告每增加1美元,报纸的印刷广告就会损失22美元。尽管可以想象广告格局的总体变化(例如定向搜索广告的增长)促成了平面广告的下降,但尚不清楚在线报纸广告的增长是否加剧或缓解了这一全球趋势。我们通过研究广告商如何在一段时间内在报纸上的在线媒体和印刷媒体之间重新分配其媒体预算来调查这种担忧。我们使用关于2005年至2011年美国排名前50位报纸中帐户级广告支出的独特面板数据进行了实证分析。在考虑了广告商之间的横断面异质性以及可能推动印刷和在线报纸广告的一些因素之后,我们发现这两种媒体选择中的广告支出之间存在负相关关系。因此,与在线支出保持不变甚至减少的情况相比,广告商在增加在线支出时更倾向于减少印刷支出。由于我们不依赖排他性限制,因此我们不能排除驱使印刷广告和在线广告同时污染这种关系的残留因素。但是,这种潜在的混淆因素(例如,总媒体预算的变化)可能已引起印刷广告和在线广告之间的正相关。因此,我们恢复的负面关系暗示着广告商将印刷品和在线报纸广告视为替代品。反过来,这意味着在线报纸广告的增长加剧了印刷广告的总体下降。总体而言,我们将2005年至2011年间印刷报纸广告收入下降7-17%归因于在线报纸广告的增长。我们得出的结论是,在报纸的营销决策中,食人化应该是可信的考虑因素。但是,由于从未从报纸购买在线广告的广告商也发生了很大一部分印刷广告收入下降的情况,因此报纸内的同类相食并不仅是印刷广告下滑的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号