...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an international journal >Mixed or merged? Integration as the real challenge for mixed methods
【24h】

Mixed or merged? Integration as the real challenge for mixed methods

机译:混合还是合并?集成是混合方法的真正挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Giampietro Gobo called for new methods that combine qualitative and quantitative approaches in a single instrument, suggesting this was the next challenge facing social research and mixed methods in particular. The purpose of this paper is to respond to that challenge. Design/methodology/approach - An overview of methods, demonstrating their inherently mixed qualities, with special emphasis on a range of methods that can be classified as merged. Findings - The real challenge is not to find merged methods, but to ensure integration of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the methods used during the analysis and writing processes. Practical implications - Researchers need to be alerted to the mixed elements within their work, to leam how to better tap into these and to exploit the integrative potential of their methods during analysis and writing. Researchers need more "rounded" methods training. Originality/value - This paper refocuses the challenge facing mixed methods research.
机译:目的-Giampietro Gobo呼吁在单一工具中结合定性和定量方法的新方法,这表明这是社会研究尤其是混合方法面临的下一个挑战。本文的目的是应对这一挑战。设计/方法/方法-方法概述,展示其固有的混合特性,特别强调可以归为合并方法的一系列方法。结果-真正的挑战不是找到合并的方法,而是确保分析和编写过程中所使用方法的定量和定性方面的整合。实际意义-研究人员需要警惕他们的工作中的混杂要素,以学习如何更好地利用这些要素,并在分析和编写过程中挖掘其方法的综合潜力。研究人员需要更多的“全面”方法培训。原创性/价值-本文重新关注混合方法研究面临的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号