...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an international journal >A critical exploration of 'access' in qualitative international business field research Towards a concept of socio-cultural and multidimensional research practice
【24h】

A critical exploration of 'access' in qualitative international business field research Towards a concept of socio-cultural and multidimensional research practice

机译:在定性国际商业领域研究中对“获取”的批判性探索,以建立社会文化和多维研究实践的概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Researchers often face challenges in locating and obtaining relevant and meaningful information during qualitative international business (IB) field research in other countries. This process constitutes an immensely critical phase, which determines the success or failure of the research endeavour. The purpose of this paper is to discuss "access" as a multidimensional and contestable concept that poses particular challenges in international and multicultural research contexts. Design/methodology/approach - This paper builds on the experience as field researchers in China/ Hong Kong (120 in-depth interviews) and the need to disseminate acquired field experiences, in particular concerning "access". The multifaceted issue of "access" is rarely featured on the IB methodological agenda, and has become a silent feature of qualitative IB research. Findings - This paper is devoted to this nexus: the lack of focus on "access" issues, and the rich sources of acquired, but mostly veiled, field experiences that feature in both IB and management research programmes. A plausible explanation for this circumstance relates to the influence of mainstream positivist and objectivist paradigms in which researchers are not recognised as having an impact on research processes, hence taking this silent feature for granted. Originality/value - By viewing the multiple dimensions of "access", we move beyond the mainstream understanding that merely relates it to the question of gaining access to a physical site and/or the time of an individual, and in which "access" is only an enterprise of securing pre-existing, tangible information. Drawing upon specific international field research experiences, this paper contributes to the methodological debate concerning "access" - beyond "technicality" and towards a concept of socio-cultural and multidimensional research practice.
机译:目的-在其他国家进行定性国际商业(IB)现场研究时,研究人员经常面临寻找和获取相关且有意义的信息的挑战。这个过程构成了一个极为关键的阶段,它决定了研究工作的成败。本文的目的是将“获取”作为一个多维且可竞争的概念进行讨论,在国际和多元文化研究背景下提出特殊的挑战。设计/方法/方法-本文基于在中国/香港的现场研究人员的经验(120次深度访谈)以及传播已获得的现场经验(尤其是有关“获取”)的必要性。 IB方法论议程很少提到“获取”这一多方面的问题,它已成为定性IB研究的一个沉默特征。调查结果-本文致力于解决这一联系:缺乏对“获取”问题的关注,以及在IB和管理研究计划中均具有的已获得但大多是隐蔽的现场经验的丰富资源。这种情况的合理解释与主流实证主义和客观主义范式的影响有关,在这种范式中,研究人员并未被认为对研究过程有影响,因此认为这种沉默的特征是理所当然的。独创性/价值-通过查看“访问”的多个维度,我们超越了仅将其与获得访问物理站点和/或个人时间的问题相关的主流理解,并且“访问”在其中仅是确保已有的有形信息的企业。借鉴特定的国际现场研究经验,本文为有关“获取”(超出“技术性”)的方法论辩论做出了贡献,并为社会文化和多维研究实践的概念做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号