...
【24h】

Raymond Carver and the voices of everyday life

机译:雷蒙德·卡佛(Raymond Carver)和日常生活的声音

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - All scholarly writing must straddle the universal and the particular. The universal is commonly addressed in terms of theoretical frameworks and analytical models, supported by the objectivity norm that has guided scientific inquiry since its inception. The particularities, on the other hand, the details and the nuts and bolts of everyday life and organizational reality, are oftentimes associated with subjectivity and therefore raise concern regarding the scholar's preferences and convictions. In order to better balance objectivity and subjectivity in the organization studies literature, it is important to pay attention to how the choice of literary style may apprehend and convey organizational realities. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Discussing the role of literature, and the work of the American short-story writer and poet Raymond Carver, more specifically, as a domain wherein language resonates with the pace and breathing of everyday life, it is suggested that an increased level of "lyrical sensibility" in scholarly vocabularies is conducive to more nuanced accounts of organizational practices. To substantiate Carver's argument, ethnographies of occupational work is referenced and compared to Carver's work. Findings - Carver's emphasis on writing stories and dialogs that do not hide behind jargon, nor impose unnecessary literary experiments or heavy-handed literary vocabularies on texts, is exemplary to organization researchers. In particular, Carver emphasizes the role of materiality and objects in his stories, the understated tension and concealed conflicts in social situations and relations, and points at how individuals interpret situations wherein they are located; in many cases, leading to apathy and indolence as the protagonists cannot consider meaningful ways to handle perceived issues or to move along. Carver's emphasis on mundane experience is therefore conducive to a wider recognition of subjectivity in organization studies. Originality/value - The paper broadens the discussion about organization studies writing by introducing the work of Raymond Carver, a seminal author only sparsely featured in organization and management studies.
机译:目的-所有学术著作都必须跨越普遍性和特殊性。普遍性通常用理论框架和分析模型来解决,并由客观性规范支持,该规范自成立以来一直指导着科学探究。另一方面,特殊性,日常生活和组织现实的细节以及细节,往往与主观性相关联,因此引起了人们对学者的偏爱和信念的关注。为了更好地平衡组织研究文献的客观性和主观性,重要的是要注意文学风格的选择如何理解和传达组织现实。本文旨在讨论这些问题。设计/方法论/方法-讨论文学的作用以及美国短篇小说家和诗人雷蒙德·卡佛(Raymond Carver)的工作,更具体地讲,语言应与日常生活的节奏和呼吸产生共鸣。学术词汇中“抒情性”水平的提高有利于组织实践的细微差别。为了证实卡弗的观点,引用了职业工作的人种志并将其与卡弗的工作进行比较。调查结果-卡弗强调撰写故事和对话的故事,不会隐藏行话,也不会在文本上施加不必要的文学实验或笨拙的文学词汇,这对组织研究人员而言是典范。特别是,卡弗在故事中强调了重要性和客体的作用,在社交场合和关系中低调的张力和隐蔽的冲突,并指出了个人如何解释他们所处的位置;在许多情况下,由于主角无法考虑有意义的方式来处理感知到的问题或继续前进,因此会导致冷漠和懒惰。因此,Carver强调平凡的经验有助于组织研究中对主观性的广泛认可。原创性/价值-本文通过介绍仅在组织和管理研究中稀少发表的开创性作者Raymond Carver的工作,扩大了有关组织研究写作的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号