首页> 外文期刊>Publius: The Journal of Federalism >Federalism and Representation in the Theory of the Founding Fathers: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Canadian Constitutionaln Thought
【24h】

Federalism and Representation in the Theory of the Founding Fathers: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Canadian Constitutionaln Thought

机译:开国元勋理论中的联邦制与代表制:美国和加拿大宪政思想的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While there are many important points of comparison and contrast between the American and Canadian foundings, perhaps none is more important than the role of political theory. Both the United States and Canada share much in common historically, structurally, and theoretically, yet each established a very different form of federalism that has in turn developed in strikingly different ways. Starting from a common British inheritance, different theoretical applications resulted in divergent conceptions of sovereignty and representation that affected the system of federalism in each country. Our findings demonstrate the crucial importance for understanding the political philosophy of the founding relative to the ongoing dialectic of the Great Conversation. In these two nations, the federalism that developed resulted in substantive differences in representation and constitutional structures.
机译:尽管美国和加拿大的建国有许多重要的比较点和对比点,但也许没有什么比政治理论的作用更重要。美国和加拿大在历史上,结构上和理论上都有许多共同点,但各自建立了非常不同的联邦主义形式,而这种形式反过来又以截然不同的方式发展。从英国的共同遗产开始,不同的理论应用导致对主权和代表制的不同看法,影响了每个国家的联邦制。我们的发现表明,相对于正在进行的大对话辩护,理解创立者的政治哲学至关重要。在这两个国家,发展起来的联邦制导致代表制和宪法结构发生实质性差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号