...
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >'Pregnancy and labour cause more deaths than oral contraceptives': The debate on the pill in the Spanish press in the 1960s and 1970s
【24h】

'Pregnancy and labour cause more deaths than oral contraceptives': The debate on the pill in the Spanish press in the 1960s and 1970s

机译:“怀孕和分娩比口服避孕药造成更多的死亡”:1960年代和1970年代西班牙媒体对这种药的争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From 1941 to 1978, Franco's regime in Spain banned all contraceptive methods. The pill started circulating in Spain from the 1960s, officially as a drug used in gynaecological therapy. However, in the following decade it was also increasingly used and prescribed as a contraceptive. This paper analyses debates about the contraceptive pill in the Spanish daily newspaper ABC and in two magazines, Blanco y Negro and Triunfo, in the 1960s and 1970s. It concludes that the debate on this contraceptive method was much more heterogeneous than might be expected given the Catholic-conservative character of the dictatorship. The daily press focused on the adverse effects of the drug and magazines concentrated on the ethical and religious aspects of the pill and discussed it in a generally positive light Male doctors and Catholic authors dominated the debate.
机译:从1941年到1978年,佛朗哥在西班牙的政权禁止所有避孕方法。该药丸从1960年代开始在西班牙开始流通,正式用作妇科治疗药物。然而,在随后的十年中,它也越来越多地被使用并被规定为避孕药具。本文分析了1960年代和1970年代西班牙日报ABC以及两家杂志Blanco y Negro和Triunfo中有关避孕药的争论。结论是,鉴于独裁者的天主教保守性,关于这种避孕方法的辩论比预期的要多样化得多。每日新闻集中于药物的不良影响,杂志集中在药片的伦理和宗教方面,并以积极的态度进行讨论。男性医生和天主教作家主导了辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号