首页> 外文期刊>Public performance & management review >Transaction Hazards and Governance Mechanisms in Public-Private Partnerships: A Comparative Study of Two Cases
【24h】

Transaction Hazards and Governance Mechanisms in Public-Private Partnerships: A Comparative Study of Two Cases

机译:公私伙伴关系中的交易风险和治理机制:两个案例的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public-private partnerships (PPPs), although widely used to build infrastructure and deliver public services around the world, have confronted transaction hazards of uncertainty, asset specificity, information asymmetry, and contract incompleteness. Drawing from contracting theories, this article takes a holistic approach to identifying eight governance mechanisms to address transaction hazards: cognition and flexibility for uncertainty, safeguards and credibility for asset specificity, transparency and competition for information asymmetry, and reputation and trust for contract incompleteness. We then conduct a comparative study of two PPP power projects, one successful in China and the other failed in India, to illustrate how governance mechanisms function to address those transaction hazards. Among eight governance mechanisms, flexibility, credibility, and competition are especially critical to determine the success or failure of PPP projects.
机译:公私伙伴关系(PPPs)尽管已广泛用于在世界范围内建立基础设施和提供公共服务,但仍面临不确定性,资产专用性,信息不对称和合同不完整的交易风险。本文从契约理论的角度出发,采用整体方法来确定八个治理机制来解决交易风险:对不确定性的认知和灵活性,对资产特异性的保障和信誉,对信息不对称的透明度和竞争以及对合同不完整的声誉和信任。然后,我们对两个PPP电力项目进行了比较研究,一个在中国成功,另一个在印度失败,以说明治理机制如何应对这些交易风险。在八个治理机制中,灵活性,信誉和竞争对于确定PPP项目的成败至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号