首页> 外文期刊>Public administration review >Budgeting for Accountability: A Comparative Study of Budget Reforms in the United States during the Progressive Era and in Contemporary China
【24h】

Budgeting for Accountability: A Comparative Study of Budget Reforms in the United States during the Progressive Era and in Contemporary China

机译:问责制的预算:进步时期美国和当代中国预算改革的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Budgeting is an important mechanism for ensuring public accountability. How do budget reforms in the United States during the Progressive Era compare to those in contemporary China? Are administrative and legislative budget controls essential to an effective, efficient government? Though the two countries differ in many respects, significant parallels between their budget reforms are evident. In the United States, electoral accountability alone does not guarantee overall government accountability if proper budgetary institutions are absent. China's recent budget reform reveals that it is possible to develop accountability, absent open elections, but with limitations and constraints. Lessons on budgeting and accountability for other developing and transitional countries are drawn from this comparative study.
机译:预算编制是确保公众问责制的重要机制。渐进时代的美国预算改革与当代中国的预算改革相比如何?行政和立法预算控制对有效,高效的政府至关重要吗?尽管两国在许多方面存在分歧,但预算改革之间存在明显的相似之处。在美国,如果缺少适当的预算机构,仅凭选举责任制就无法保证政府的整体责任制。中国最近的预算改革表明,建立问责制,缺席公开选举是有可能的,但有其局限性和局限性。这项比较研究从其他发展中国家和转型国家的预算和责任制方面吸取了教训。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public administration review》 |2009年第suppla期|S53-S59|共7页
  • 作者

    Jun Ma; Yilin Hou;

  • 作者单位

    Sun Yat-sen University, China;

    Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, University of Georgia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号