首页> 外文期刊>Public administration review >Extending the Theory of Goal Ambiguity to Programs:Examining the Relationship between Goal Ambiguity and Performance
【24h】

Extending the Theory of Goal Ambiguity to Programs:Examining the Relationship between Goal Ambiguity and Performance

机译:将目标歧义理论扩展到程序:研究目标歧义与绩效之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the main assumptions of empirical studies conducted on the influence of goal ambiguity in public management is that goal ambiguity relates negatively to performance. However, this relationship has rarely been tested at the program level because common goal ambiguity and performance measures for disparate government programs have been scant. The availability of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) results for a number of federal programs provides the opportunity for an analysis testing the foregoing assumption. Measures of program goal ambiguity-target, timeline, and program evaluation-are shown to have negative relationships with different program performance scores, taking into account alternative influences or biases on performance. This analysis extends the theory of goal ambiguity by providing the first analysis of large-sample federal programs. The theoretical and practical implications are presented in the discussion and conclusion.
机译:关于目标歧义对公共管理的影响进行的实证研究的主要假设之一是,目标歧义与绩效负相关。但是,这种关系很少在计划级别上进行过测试,因为针对不同政府计划的共同目标模糊性和绩效衡量标准很少。许多联邦计划的计划评估评级工具(PART)结果的可用性为进行上述假设的分析提供了机会。考虑到对绩效的替代影响或偏见,对计划目标歧义性,目标,时间表和计划评估的度量显示出与不同的计划绩效得分具有负相关关系。通过提供对大型样本联邦计划的首次分析,该分析扩展了目标歧义的理论。在讨论和结论中介绍了理论和实践意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public administration review》 |2014年第2期|205-219|共15页
  • 作者

    Chan Su Jung;

  • 作者单位

    City University of Hong Kong, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号