...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological medicine >Enhanced treatment for depression in primary care: long-term outcomes of a psycho-educational prevention program alone and enriched with psychiatric consultation or cognitive behavioral therapy
【24h】

Enhanced treatment for depression in primary care: long-term outcomes of a psycho-educational prevention program alone and enriched with psychiatric consultation or cognitive behavioral therapy

机译:改善初级保健中的抑郁症治疗:仅通过心理教育预防计划的长期结果,并通过精神病咨询或认知行为疗法进行补充

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. The long-term outcome of major depression is often unfavorable, and because most cases of depression are managed by general practitioners (GPs), this places stress on the need to improve treatment in primary care. This study evaluated the long-term effects of enhancing the GP's usual care (UC) with three experimental interventions. Method. A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 1998 to 2003. The main inclusion criterion was receiving GP treatment for a depressive episode. We compared: (1) UC (n = 72) with UC enhanced with: (2) a psycho-educational prevention (PEP) program (n = 112); (3) psychiatrist-enhanced PEP (n = 37); and (4) brief cognitive behavioral therapy followed by PEP (CBT-enhanced PEP) (n = 44). We assessed depression status quarterly during a 3-year follow-up. Results. Pooled across groups, depressive disorder-free and symptom-free times during follow-up were 83% and 17% respectively. Almost 64% of the patients had a relapse or recurrence, the median time to recurrence was 96 weeks, and the mean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score over 12 follow-up assessments was 9.6. Unexpectedly, PEP patients had no better outcomes than UC patients. However, psychiatrist-enhanced PEP and CBT-enhanced PEP patients reported lower BDI severity during follow-up than UC patients [mean difference 2.07 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.13-3.00) and 1.62 (95% CI 0.70-2.55) respectively] and PEP patients [2.37 (95% CI 1.35-3.39) and 1.93 (95% CI 0.92-2.94) respectively]. Conclusions. The PEP program had no extra benefit compared to UC and may even worsen outcome in severely depressed patients. Enhancing treatment of depression in primary care with psychiatric consultation or brief CBT seems to improve the long-term outcome, but findings need replication as the interventions were combined with the ineffective PEP program.
机译:背景。重度抑郁症的长期结果通常是不利的,并且由于大多数抑郁症病例是由全科医生(GP)处理的,因此,这强调了改善初级保健治疗的必要性。这项研究通过三种实验干预措施评估了加强GP常规护理(UC)的长期效果。方法。 1998年至2003年进行了一项随机对照试验。主要纳入标准为抑郁症发作接受GP治疗。我们比较了:(1)UC(n = 72)与增强UC的效果:(2)心理教育预防(PEP)程序(n = 112); (3)加强精神科医生的PEP(n = 37); (4)短暂的认知行为疗法后进行PEP(CBT增强PEP)(n = 44)。在三年的随访中,我们每季度评估一次抑郁状态。结果。汇总各组,随访期间无抑郁无症状和无症状的时间分别为83%和17%。几乎64%的患者复发或复发,中位复发时间为96周,在12项随访评估中,贝克抑郁量表(BDI)的平均评分为9.6。出乎意料的是,PEP患者没有比UC患者更好的结局。但是,精神科医生增强的PEP和CBT增强的PEP患者在随访期间的BDI严重程度低于UC患者[均数分别为2.07(95%置信区间(CI)1.13-3.00)和1.62(95%CI 0.70-2.55)。 ]和PEP患者[分别为2.37(95%CI 1.35-3.39)和1.93(95%CI 0.92-2.94)。结论。与UC相比,PEP计划没有任何额外的好处,甚至可能使重度抑郁的患者的结局恶化。通过精神科咨询或短暂的CBT加强初级保健中的抑郁症治疗似乎可以改善长期结果,但由于干预措施与无效的PEP计划相结合,因此需要重复研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号