首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: Applications, Theory and Research >Varieties of psychoanalytic research  1. This paper is a revised version of the paper originally given as the Annual Research Lecture of the British Psychoanalytical Society on 17 March 2010. View all notes
【24h】

Varieties of psychoanalytic research  1. This paper is a revised version of the paper originally given as the Annual Research Lecture of the British Psychoanalytical Society on 17 March 2010. View all notes

机译:各种精神分析研究– 1。本文是该论文的修订版,最初于2010年3月17日作为英国精神分析学会的年度研究报告发布。查看所有笔记

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The author of this paper discusses three different research traditions in the psychoanalytic field, arguing that all of these are necessary to its growth and development. The traditions are those of empirical scientific study into the outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment, the development of psychoanalytic theory and technique within the clinical consulting room, and explorations on the boundaries between psychoanalysis and many neighbouring disciplines. On the first of these depends the legitimacy of psychoanalytic practice in public health settings, on the second the continued advance of fundamental knowledge within psychoanalysis, and on the third the broader influence of psychoanalytic ideas within the broader culture. It is argued that psychoanalytic institutions need to give more attention to all of these, and to develop a more active relationship to academic methods of enquiry.View full textDownload full textKeywordspsychoanalytic research, outcome studies, clinical consulting room, interdisciplinary studiesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2010.513545
机译:本文的作者讨论了精神分析领域的三种不同的研究传统,认为所有这些传统对其成长和发展都是必要的。这些传统是对精神分析治疗结果进行实证科学研究,在临床咨询室中发展精神分析理论和技术以及探索精神分析与许多相邻学科之间的界限的传统。首先,这取决于精神分析实践在公共卫生环境中的合法性,其次取决于精神分析领域内基础知识的不断发展,其次取决于精神分析思想在更广泛文化中的更广泛影响。有人认为,精神分析机构需要更多地关注所有这些问题,并发展与研究方法的更积极的关系。查看全文下载全文关键词精神分析研究,结果研究,临床咨询室,跨学科研究相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2010.513545

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号