首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >The Necessity of Shared Illusion in the Creation of “Reality”: Commentary on Paper by Christopher Bonovitz
【24h】

The Necessity of Shared Illusion in the Creation of “Reality”: Commentary on Paper by Christopher Bonovitz

机译:创造“现实”中共享幻觉的必要性:克里斯托弗·博诺维茨(Christopher Bonovitz)在论文中的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a rejoinder to Bonovitz that playfully joins him in a language that puts aside our typical conceptual tools that are still geared toward dualisms, I offer a phenomenological perspective on linking fantasy and reality. I suggest that Bonovitz offers a rich descriptive contribution to our work that, at its best, is a phenomenological description of the different modes of the creation of experience. In explaining his work, however, Bonovitz has developed a mixed discourse, one that shifts between a phenomenological sensibility and one that can slip into relying on our natural logic that differentiates between an isolated subjectivity and the world. Such a perspective underemphasizes the more radical phenomenological stance that in experience we are already engaged, already linked with our patients; that elaborating engagement within the frame of the play allows sufficient distance to begin to look at participation in a way that changes it into something new. Change occurs through the connections of different kinds of participation rather than through linking the separate spheres of fantasy and reality. In the end, however, this mixed discourse works in the sense of providing a compelling and thoughtful heuristic for revitalizing the role of fantasy in our clinical work.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.514821
机译:在与Bonovitz的对接中,他用一种语言调皮地加入了他的行列,抛弃了我们仍然面向二元论的典型概念工具,我提供了一种将幻想与现实联系起来的现象学观点。我建议波诺维兹为我们的工作提供了丰富的描述性贡献,充其量是对经验创造的不同模式的现象学描述。然而,在解释他的作品时,博诺维茨发展了一种混合的话语,一种在现象学的敏感性之间转换,另一种可以依靠我们的自然逻辑来区分孤立的主观性和世界。这样的观点过分强调了更为激进的现象学立场,即根据经验,我们已经参与进来,并且已经与患者建立了联系。戏剧框架内精心设计的参与方式允许足够的距离开始观察参与方式,从而将其改变为新的事物。变化是通过不同类型的参与的联系而不是通过将幻想和现实的各个领域联系起来而发生的。然而,最终,这种混合的话语的作用是提供一种引人入胜且深思熟虑的启发式方法,以振兴幻想在我们的临床工作中的作用。查看全文下载全文::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.514821

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号