...
首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Planning >The limits to market-based strategies for addressing land abandonment in shrinking American cities
【24h】

The limits to market-based strategies for addressing land abandonment in shrinking American cities

机译:解决日益萎缩的美国城市中土地遗弃问题的基于市场的策略的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Land abandonment is one of the most challenging planning problems facing shrinking cities in the United States. Most abandoned urban land finds its way into the tax foreclosure process wherein the city or county places a lien on the property and then eventually takes possession. Many American state laws encourage (or demand) cities to then sell these properties, often for as little as several hundred dollars. The process tempts speculative investors to enter the scene, and their often "predatory" acquisition patterns complicate city planning and redevelopment efforts. In response, activists have proposed the reform of tax foreclosure laws to allow municipalities and planners greater strategic latitude with abandoned properties. They propose enhancing cities' abilities to demolish or refurbish properties, and even to remove parcels from the market. These efforts have been somewhat successful, but have generated a backlash from market-oriented think tanks and business interests reluctant to see governmental planning powers enhanced. This paper examines the emergence of land abandonment reforms and the powerful opposition that has hindered change. Eight cities were selected and placed into three categories based on their current land abandonment policies: consciously managerial (Cleveland, Flint, Saint Louis); limited managerial (Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Rochester); and market-only (Detroit, Gary). Two particularly striking findings arise from this analysis. First, in addition to inhibiting systematic planning efforts in cities, market-only policies appear, ironically, to be associated with the erosion of market conditions. Second, the market importance of government intervention-whether in the form of rent vouchers or sensible land management-often does not receive sufficient attention in cities experiencing abandonment. Most tend to continue market-oriented strategies which complicate planning efforts to re-purpose land in socially beneficial ways.
机译:土地遗弃是美国城市萎缩面临的最具挑战性的规划问题之一。大多数被遗弃的城市土地进入了取消抵押品赎回权的过程,在这个过程中,城市或县对财产置有留置权,然后最终占有。美国许多州的法律都鼓励(或要求)城市出售这些物业,价格通常低至几百美元。这一过程诱使投机者进入现场,他们通常的“掠夺性”收购模式使城市规划和重建工作变得复杂。作为回应,激进主义者提出了对取消抵押品赎回权税法的改革,以允许市政当局和规划者对被遗弃的财产具有更大的战略自由度。他们提议提高城市拆除或翻新物业,甚至从市场上清除包裹的能力。这些努力取得了一定的成功,但遭到了以市场为导向的智囊团和不愿看到政府计划权得到增强的商业利益的强烈反对。本文考察了土地遗弃改革的出现以及阻碍变革的强大反对力量。根据当前的土地废弃政策,选择了八个城市并将其分为三类:有意识地进行管理(克里夫兰,弗林特,圣路易斯);有限管理人员(布法罗,匹兹堡,罗切斯特);和仅限市场(底特律,加里)。该分析得出两个特别惊人的发现。首先,具有讽刺意味的是,除了抑制城市中的系统规划工作外,纯市场政策似乎与市场条件的侵蚀有关。其次,政府干预的市场重要性(无论是房租凭单还是明智的土地管理形式)在遭受遗弃的城市中往往得不到足够的重视。大多数人倾向于继续以市场为导向的战略,使以社会有利的方式重新分配土地的规划工作复杂化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号