【24h】

Determining dino size

机译:确定恐龙大小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whether a stable body temperature via metabolism (endo-thermy) or outside temperatures (ectothermy) determined the size limits of dinosaurs is a source of controversy among paleontologists. Brian McNab pro-rnposes that the availability of food resources was more important than thermal biology in determining a dinosaur's ultimate size. Like couch potatoes sitting within easy reach of high-calorie foods, the size of dinosaurs likely stems from the abundance of resources coupled with low energy ex-rnpenditures. The author developed a model that describes a vertebrate's energy expenditures and takes into account an organism's mass and food habits. Applying the model to existing and extinct mammals, McNab noted that the model successfully predicted the large size of baleen whales, as compared to an ancient rhinoceros and today's elephant. The model also reflected the difference in body size between mammals and large reptiles. Noting that thermal biology differences are easily seen in small organisms, McNab suggests that dinosaurs were neither ecto-thermic nor endothermic, but maintained an intermediate temperature between mammals and reptiles, a feat enabled by their large mass.
机译:是通过新陈代谢(体内热)来稳定体温还是通过外部温度(外热)来确定恐龙的大小限制,是古生物学家争论的源头。布赖恩·麦克纳布(Brian McNab)提出,在确定恐龙的最终大小时,食物资源的可用性比热生物学更为重要。就像坐在高热量食物容易触及的沙发土豆一样,恐龙的大小可能源于丰富的资源以及低能耗的设备。作者开发了一个模型,该模型描述了脊椎动物的能量消耗,并考虑了生物体的质量和饮食习惯。将模型应用到现有和已灭绝的哺乳动物中,McNab指出,与古老的犀牛和当今的大象相比,该模型成功地预测了鲸鱼的大尺寸。该模型还反映出哺乳动物和大型爬行动物的体型差异。 McNab指出,在小型生物中很容易看到热生物学差异,因此他认为恐龙既不是外部热也不是吸热的,而是维持了哺乳动物和爬行动物之间的中间温度,这是它们大量繁殖的壮举。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号