首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers >Housing and sustainability: demolition or refurbishment?
【24h】

Housing and sustainability: demolition or refurbishment?

机译:住房与可持续发展:拆除还是翻新?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The demolition or refurbishment of older housing has been an active policy area since the late 1880s in the UK, when the government first authorised the statutory demolition of unsanitary slums. The debate on demolition and new building has been intensified since 2003, with government proposals for large-scale clearance and new construction. This paper summarises the evidence and debate on whether demolition would reduce greenhouse gas emissions from buildings. It examines whether a more achievable and socially beneficial route to reducing energy use in the built environment exists, based on the fact that buildings account for half of the UK's carbon emissions. This paper argues that large-scale and accelerated demolition would neither help with meeting energy and climate change targets, nor would it address social needs. Refurbishment offers clear advantages in time, cost, community impact, prevention of building sprawl, reuse of existing infrastructure and protection of existing communities. It can also lead to significantly reduced energy use in buildings in both the short and long term.
机译:自从1880年代末期英国政府首次授权对不卫生的贫民窟进行法定拆除以来,对旧住房的拆除或整修一直是一个积极的政策领域。自2003年以来,关于拆除和新建建筑的争论一直在加剧,政府提出了大规模清理和新建建筑的建议。本文总结了有关拆除是否会减少建筑物温室气体排放的证据和争论。它基于建筑物占英国碳排放量一半的事实,研究了在减少建筑环境中的能源消耗方面是否存在更可行且对社会有益的途径。本文认为,大规模的加速拆除既无助于实现能源和气候变化目标,也无济于事。翻新在时间,成本,社区影响,防止建筑物蔓延,重复使用现有基础设施以及保护现有社区方面具有明显的优势。从短期和长期来看,它还可以显着减少建筑物的能源消耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号