首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers >Seeking common ground: three perspectives on public space
【24h】

Seeking common ground: three perspectives on public space

机译:寻求共同点:公共空间的三种观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public spaces have been a central concern of urban planners for centuries; more recently they have also captured the attention of sociologists, geographers, political scientists and economists. Focusing on urban public spaces, this review outlines three major perspectives on public space. The legal-economic perspective seeks to answer the most concrete questions about public space (what is it and who pays for it?), thereby laying the definitional and institutional groundwork for other enquiries. The socio-spatial perspective takes the existence of public space for granted and is more concerned with questions of design and application (what does it look like and how is it used?). Finally, the political perspective asks about public space's role in democracy, both abstractly as a site for discursive activities and concretely as a site of exclusion or empowerment. While these three perspectives frequently overlap in practice, they are nonetheless distinguishable in their origins, assumptions and foci. This paper thus serves to illustrate the potential for further cross-disciplinary connections that would enhance understanding of how public space works.
机译:几个世纪以来,公共空间一直是城市规划者关注的重点。最近,它们也引起了社会学家,地理学家,政治学家和经济学家的关注。本文以城市公共空间为重点,概述了公共空间的三个主要观点。法律经济学的观点试图回答有关公共空间的最具体问题(它是什么,由谁付费),从而为其他询问奠定了定义和制度基础。社会空间观点认为公共空间的存在是理所当然的,并且更关注设计和应用的问题(它看起来像什么,如何使用?)。最后,政治观点询问了公共空间在民主中的作用,抽象地既是讨论活动的场所,又是排斥或授权的场所。尽管这三种观点在实践中经常重叠,但它们的起源,假设和重点却是可区分的。因此,本文旨在说明进一步跨学科联系的潜力,这将增进对公共空间工作原理的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号