【24h】

Via-in-Pad Myths

机译:痛经神话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

TRUE OR NOT true? When you need thermal vias, more is better; bigger is better.Logically, this would seem to be the case. There are limits though, especially if you want a reliably assembled product. Older parts with heat slugs easily accessible for bolting on heatsinks didn't have this issue. Just bolt on a piece of metal and maybe blow a fan across it. It's different with a lot of the new, smaller surface mount packages. Many have a heat slug on the bottom, which requires carefully placed thermal vias to a copper pad on the underside of the board.An extreme case of flooding the land with vias can be seen in FIGURE 1. In terms of assembly, you can hack this together for a prototype, but it'll never fly in a production environment. It would be much better to use fewer smaller vias and have the center land covered with solder mask, except where the metal on the chip is exposed, as in FIGURE 2.
机译:对还是错?当您需要散热通孔时,越多越好;从逻辑上讲似乎是这种情况。但是有一些限制,特别是如果您想要可靠地组装的产品。带有散热片的较旧零件很容易通过螺栓固定在散热器上,因此没有这个问题。只需用螺栓固定在一块金属上,然后在其上吹一个风扇即可。许多新的较小的表面贴装封装与之不同。许多产品的底部都有散热片,这就需要将导热过孔仔细地放置在电路板下侧的铜垫上。图1中可以看到一个极端的情况,即用过孔淹没了焊盘。一起作为原型,但它永远不会在生产环境中飞翔。最好使用较少的较小的通孔,并用焊料掩膜覆盖中心焊盘,除非芯片上的金属暴露在外,如图2所示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号