首页> 外文期刊>Exploration Geophysics >Sensitivity of shale anisotropic parameters to core cutting rotation error
【24h】

Sensitivity of shale anisotropic parameters to core cutting rotation error

机译:页岩各向异性参数对岩心切削旋转误差的敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In laboratories, core cannot always be cut exactly along the axis of symmetry (normal to the bedding plane), which leads to a minor core cutting rotation (CCR) error. The presence of a small CCR error can give rise to an error in computation of anisotropic parameters, which will result in erroneous P-wave and S-wave velocities (V-P, V-SV and V-SH). In this study, we test the sensitivity of Thomson's anisotropic parameters, epsilon (epsilon), gamma () and delta (), to the CCR error. In the vertical transverse isotropy (VTI) system where no rotation exists, values of epsilon, and will not vary with azimuth. Similarly, in VTI the values of V-P, V-SV and V-SH, measured at orientations with respect to the axis of symmetry, will also not vary with azimuth. We modelled and analysed the error generated, in anisotropic parameters and phase velocities, due to rotation error of 5 degrees on VTI ANNIE model data, and the Niobrara Shale core sample measurements. For these two cases, we obtained values of P-wave and S-wave velocities along with anisotropy parameters epsilon, and , at 0 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees orientations with respect to the axis of symmetry, before and after a rotation of 5 degrees, for different azimuth directions. This study shows that, when the CCR error exists, epsilon, and vary with azimuth. For Niobrara Shale samples, we observed that, among all three Thomsen's parameters is the most sensitive parameter to the CCR error; when we varied azimuth, we observed a sign change of from positive to negative. For epsilon and , variation in azimuth lead to only slight changes in values without any change of sign. The CCR error affects V-P and V-s measurements the most at 45 degrees orientation, and the least at 90 degrees orientation. The maximum error occurred at 0 degrees azimuth, whereas the minimum error occurs at 90 degrees azimuth. This analysis suggests that, if core cutting rotation exists, phase velocities should be measured at 90 degrees azimuth for accurate results.
机译:在实验室中,无法始终沿对称轴(垂直于铺层平面)精确地切割岩心,这会导致较小的岩心切割旋转(CCR)误差。小的CCR误差的存在会导致各向异性参数计算中的误差,这将导致错误的P波和S波速度(V-P,V-SV和V-SH)。在这项研究中,我们测试了汤姆森各向异性参数epsilon(epsilon),gamma()和delta()对CCR误差的敏感性。在不存在旋转的垂直横向各向同性(VTI)系统中,ε的值不会随方位角而变化。同样,在VTI中,相对于对称轴的方向测量的V-P,V-SV和V-SH的值也不会随方位角而变化。我们对各向异性参数和相速度中由于VTI ANNIE模型数据的5度旋转误差和Niobrara页岩岩心样品测量值造成的误差建模并进行了分析。对于这两种情况,我们获得了P波和S波的速度值以及各向异性参数epsilon,并且在旋转5度前后相对于对称轴的方向分别为0度,45度和90度。度,用于不同的方位角方向。这项研究表明,当CCR误差存在时,ε随方位角而变化。对于Niobrara页岩样品,我们观察到,在所有三个Thomsen参数中,CCR误差是最敏感的参数。当我们改变方位角时,我们观察到从正到负的符号变化。对于epsilon和,方位角的变化只会导致值的微小变化,而没有符号的变化。 CCR误差在45度方向上影响最大V-P和V-s测量,在90度方向上影响最小。最大误差发生在0度方位角,而最小误差发生在90度方位角。该分析表明,如果存在岩心切割旋转,则应在90度方位角上测量相速度以获得准确的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Exploration Geophysics》 |2018年第05期|775-781|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Oklahoma, ConocoPhillips Sch Geol & Geophys, Norman, OK 73019 USA;

    Univ Texas Permian Basin, Dept Phys Sci, Odessa, TX 79762 USA;

    Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Informat & Commun Engn, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China;

    China Geol Survey, Ctr Oil & Gas Survey, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    China Natl Petr Corp, Bureau Geophys Prospecting, Zhuozhou 072751, Hebei, Peoples R China;

    Res Inst Hengda Century Geophys Technol Co Ltd, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China;

    SINOPEC, Northwest Oilfield Branch Co, Res Inst Petr Explorat & Prod, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    anisotropy; cutting error; delta; shale; TTI;

    机译:各向异性;切削误差;δ;页岩;TTI;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号