...
首页> 外文期刊>Population health management >Costs of Two Health Insurance Plan Programs to Mail Fecal Immunochemical Tests to Medicare and Medicaid Plan Members
【24h】

Costs of Two Health Insurance Plan Programs to Mail Fecal Immunochemical Tests to Medicare and Medicaid Plan Members

机译:两个健康保险计划的成本将粪便免疫化学测试邮件到Medicare和Medicaid计划成员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BeneFIT is a 4-year observational study of a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) program in 2 Medicaid/Medicare health plans in Oregon and Washington. In Health Plan Oregon's (HPO) collaborative model, HPO mails FITs that enrollees return to their clinics for processing. In Health Plan Washington's (HPW) centralized model, FITs are mailed directly to enrollees who return them to a centralized laboratory. This paper examines model-specific Year 1 development and implementation costs and estimates costs per screened enrollee. Staff completed activity-based costing spreadsheets. Non-labor costs were from study and external data. Data matched each plan's 2016 development and implementation dates. HPO development costs were $23.0K, primarily administration (eg, clinic recruitment). HPW development costs were $37.3K, 38.8% for FIT selection and mailing/tracking protocols. Year 1 implementation costs were $51.6K for HPO and $139.7K for HPW, reflecting HPW's greater outreach. Labor was 50.4% ($26.0K) of HPO's implementation costs, primarily enrollee eligibility and processing returned FITs, and was shared by HPO ($17.0K) and 6 participating clinics ($9.0K). Labor was 10.5% of HPW's implementation costs, primarily administration and enrollee eligibility. HPO's implementation costs per enrollee were 12.3% higher ($18.36) than for HPW ($16.34). Similar proportions of completed FITs among screening-eligibles produced a 15% lower cost per completed FIT in HPW ($89.75) vs. HPO ($105.79). Implementation costs for HPO only (without clinic costs) were $15.16/mailed introductory letter, $16.09/mailed FIT, and $87.35/completed FIT, comparable to HPW. Results highlight cost implications of different approaches to implementing a mailed FIT program in 2 Medicaid/Medicare health plans.
机译:福利是在俄勒冈州和华盛顿的2个医疗补助/ Medicare健康计划中邮寄粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)计划的一个4年的观察研究。在卫生计划俄勒冈州(HPO)协作模式中,HPO邮件适合登记返回其诊所进行处理。在华盛顿州(HPW)的集中式型号中,适合邮寄给将其退回集中式实验室的登记册。本文审查了特定于模型的第1年的开发和实施成本,并估计每个筛选的登记者的成本。工作人员完成了基于活动的成本计算电子表格。非劳动力成本来自研究和外部数据。数据符合每个计划2016年的2016年开发和实施日期。 HPO开发成本为23.0k美元,主要是管理(例如,临床招聘)。 HPW开发成本为37.3K,适合选择和邮寄/跟踪协议38.8%。 1年度实施成本为HPO为51.6k美元,HPW为139.7万美元,反映了HPW的更大的外展。劳动力为50.4%(26.0K)的HPO的实施成本,主要是登记资格和加工返回适合,并由HPO(17.0K)和6名参与诊所(9.0k美元)共享。劳动力为HPW实施成本的10.5%,主要是管理和登记资格。 HPO每次登记率的实施成本比HPW更高(18.36美元),而不是为期12.3%($ 16.34)。在HPW中,筛选项目之间的完整适合的类似比例在HPW($ 89.75)与HPO($ 105.79)中产生了15%的成本。仅限HPO的实施成本(没有诊所费用)为15.16美元/邮寄介绍性信件,16.09美元/邮寄合适,以及87.35美元/完成的合适,可与HPW相媲美。结果突出了在2家医疗补助/ Medicare Health计划中实施邮件合适计划的不同方法的成本影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号