首页> 外文期刊>Population health management >Cost and Utilization of Retail Clinics vs. Other Providers for Treatment of Pediatric Acute Otitis Media
【24h】

Cost and Utilization of Retail Clinics vs. Other Providers for Treatment of Pediatric Acute Otitis Media

机译:零售诊所与其他提供商治疗小儿急性中耳炎的成本和利用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A common acute condition seen by providers in retails clinics is the evaluation and treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in children younger than age 20. Annual direct treatment costs for AOM were US $5.3 billion in 1998 dollars. Based on the experience of a large retail pharmacy employer, the authors compared AOM episodes in covered dependents younger than age 20 in retail clinic states to those in states without retail clinic access. Relative costs as well as frequency of visits and antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed for both retail clinic-based, and non-retail clinic-based episodes. Rates of AOM episodes were lower in retail clinic than in non-retail clinic states (62.5 vs. 76.9 per 1000 members per year; P<.0001). The average number of visits per episode was similar between retail clinic and non-retail clinic states (1.417 vs. 1.430, respectively; P = 0.657), suggesting that retail clinics do not result in an increase in overall utilization. On a risk-adjusted basis, retail clinic episodes cost approximately $30-$130 less than community episodes, depending on year. In retail clinic states, the antibiotic prescription fill rate was 95.4% for retail clinic episodes and 82.8% for community episodes, consistent with rates in the literature. This study confirms results of earlier studies that retail clinics are a less costly setting than the community for the treatment of episodes of otitis media There also is little evidence that retail clinics lead to duplication of services (patients receiving follow-up care in other settings).
机译:提供者在零售诊所看到的一种常见的急性疾病是对20岁以下儿童的急性中耳炎(AOM)进行评估和治疗,按1998年的美元价值计算,AOM每年的直接治疗费用为53亿美元。基于一家大型零售药房雇主的经验,作者将零售诊所州与未进入零售诊所的州的20岁以下受抚养家属的AOM发作进行了比较。对于基于零售诊所和非零售诊所的事件,分析了相对成本,就诊频率和抗生素处方。零售诊所中的AOM发作率低于非零售诊所州(每1000名成员每年62.5比76.9; P <.0001)。在零售诊所和非零售诊所之间,每集的平均访问次数相似(分别为1.417和1.430; P = 0.657),这表明零售诊所不会导致整体利用率的提高。根据风险调整后,零售诊所发作的费用比社区发作的费用低约30-130美元,具体取决于年份。在零售诊所州,零售诊所发作的抗生素处方填充率为95.4%,社区发作为82.8%,与文献中的比率一致。这项研究证实了早期研究的结果,即零售诊所的治疗费用比社区治疗中耳炎的费用低。也几乎没有证据表明零售诊所会导致服务重复(在其他情况下接受后续护理的患者) 。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Population health management》 |2016年第5期|341-348|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA;

    Walgreen Co, 1415 Lake Cook Rd,MS L444, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA;

    Walgreen Co, 1415 Lake Cook Rd,MS L444, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号