首页> 外文期刊>Polish Journal of Environmental Studies >Research on Impact of Different Environmental Regulation Tools on Energy Efficiency in China
【24h】

Research on Impact of Different Environmental Regulation Tools on Energy Efficiency in China

机译:不同环境监管工具对我国能效的影响研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper uses the super-efficiency DEA model to study the super-efficiency energy efficiency values of 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2018, compares the differences between different regions, and verifies the impact of different environmental regulatory tools on energy efficiency. The results show that the regions with the highest energy efficiency in China's provinces are, in order, the eastern region, the central region, and the western region. At the same time, the impact of different environmental regulatory tools on energy efficiency is quite different. The number of environmental administrative penalties has a negative impact on China's energy efficiency, that is, increased number of environmental administrative penalties will reduce China's energy efficiency; market-encouraging environmental regulations tools impact on China's energy efficiency show a positive correlation, which means that market-encouraging environmental regulation tools are conducive to achieving a win-win goal of environmental regulation and energy efficiency in China. The voluntary environmental regulation tool has a negative correlation with energy efficiency, but it is not statistically significant, indicating that it is not the main factor affecting energy efficiency. In terms of other influencing variables, the level of economic development and technological progress are positively related to energy efficiency. The proportion of the secondary industry in regional GDP is positively related to energy efficiency, the relationship between energy consumption structure and energy efficiency is negative correlation, the degree of opening to the outside world has a negative correlation to China's energy efficiency.
机译:本文采用超级效率DEA模型从2006年到2018年研究中国30个省份的超级效率,比较了不同地区之间的差异,并验证了不同环境监管工具对能效的影响。结果表明,中国省份能源效率最高的地区是东部地区,中部地区和西部地区。与此同时,不同环境监管工具对能效的影响是完全不同的。环境行政处罚人数对中国的能源效率产生负面影响,即环境行政处罚人数的增加将降低中国的能源效率;市场鼓舞人心的环境法规工具对中国的能源效率的影响表现出积极的相关性,这意味着市场鼓励的环境监管工具有利于实现中国环境监管和能源效率的双赢目标。自愿环境调节工具与能效具有负相关性,但它没有统计学意义,表明它不是影响能量效率的主要因素。就其他影响变量而言,经济发展水平和技术进步与能源效率正相关。区域GDP中的二级行业的比例与能效呈正相关,能源消耗结构与能源效率之间的关系是负相关的,外部世界的开放程度与中国的能效具有负相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号