...
首页> 外文期刊>Policing & Society >Running the risk: police officer discretion and family violence in New Zealand
【24h】

Running the risk: police officer discretion and family violence in New Zealand

机译:冒风险:新西兰警察的自由裁量权和家庭暴力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As in other jurisdictions, the police in New Zealand have a poor record of responding to domestic violence, a category of crime widely perceived within New Zealand to be a particularly extensive problem relative to other societies. Against that background policy developments have focused on developing risk assessment techniques as a basis for identifying cases of family and domestic violence that are likely to escalate. Using interviews with frontline police officers, this article explores police officers' attitudes towards these investigating methods and their experiences of interviewing victims of family violence in order to gain information about risk. It is argued that while officer attitudes towards risk assessment in general terms might vary, in practice the majority of officers do not complete risk assessment processes in accordance with police policy, even if they support the practice in principle. The reasons for this, it is argued, have more to do with officer negotiation of the demands of routine patrol work and time-management processes that contribute to the marginalisation of bureaucratic procedures. Supervisors and managers compound the perception that these tasks are of second-order importance. In these ways there are cultural and managerial barriers to the more effective policing of family violence; however, the reduction of officer discretion through policy and procedure seems unlikely to provide a viable solution. A professional practice model might be more effective if officers can be trained and educated about the role of risk assessment in this context and the importance of their role as data collectors; although this does not fit easily with traditional concepts of ‘real policework’.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdomestic violence, risk management, police bureaucracy, police cultureRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2010.540662
机译:与其他司法管辖区一样,新西兰的警察应对家庭暴力的记录也很差,这是一种在新西兰国内被普遍认为是相对于其他社会而言特别广泛的问题。在这种背景下,政策发展侧重于发展风险评估技术,以此作为确定可能升级的家庭和家庭暴力案件的基础。本文通过与一线警务人员的访谈,探讨了警官对这些调查方法的态度以及他们采访家庭暴力受害者以获取有关风险信息的经验。有人认为,虽然警官对风险评估的一般态度可能会有所不同,但实际上,大多数警官即使根据原则上的支持仍未按照警察政策完成风险评估程序。有人认为,这样做的原因与官员就日常巡逻工作和时间管理程序的要求进行谈判有关,这导致官僚程序的边缘化。主管和经理们认为这些任务是第二重要的。通过这些方式,在文化和管理上存在障碍,无法更有效地维持家庭暴力。然而,通过政策和程序减少官员的酌处权似乎不太可能提供可行的解决方案。如果可以对官员进行培训和教育,使他们了解风险评估在这种情况下的作用及其作为数据收集者的重要性,那么一种专业的实践模式可能会更有效;尽管这与传统的“真正的警察工作”概念不容易配合。 ,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2010.540662

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号