首页> 外文期刊>Police Practice and Research - An International Journal >Hudson v. Michigan and the decline of the exclusionary rule
【24h】

Hudson v. Michigan and the decline of the exclusionary rule

机译:哈德森诉密歇根州和排他性规则的衰落

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the exclusionary rule has been an important part of American jurisprudence for over a century, it has long been under attack. This paper traces the evolution of the doctrine and demonstrates that, for many years, its impact has been narrowed in its application. The paper concludes with a concern for its continued viability in the American justice system.View full textDownload full textKeywordsFourth Amendment, knock and announce, exclusionary rule, US Supreme CourtRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.627740
机译:尽管排他性规则在一个多世纪以来一直是美国法学的重要组成部分,但它长期以来一直受到攻击。本文追溯了该学说的演变,并证明了多年来,其影响已在其应用中缩小。本文最后对它在美国司法系统中的持续生存能力表示关注。查看全文下载全文关键字第四修正案,敲定并宣布,排除规则,美国最高法院相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike ,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.627740

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号