首页> 外文期刊>Pipeline & gas journal >Tools To Detect Mechanical Damage In Pipe
【24h】

Tools To Detect Mechanical Damage In Pipe

机译:检测管道机械损伤的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While today's in-line inspection devices can effectively locate corrosion and metal loss, they are limited in their ability to detect one of the most significant precursors to pipeline failure-mechanical damage to the outer pipe surface. In response, GTI and the U.S. Department of Transportation are spearheading a multi-million-dollar effort to develop advanced tools and technolo-rngy to locate gouges, dents, scrapes, and other types of anomalies. In recent years, the U. S. pipeline industry's enviable safety record has been marred by a few rare, highly significant, and highly publicized incidents-Edison, NJ (1994); Reston, VA (1994); and, most recently, Bellingham, WA (1999). Fatalities occurred from the most recent of these pipeline failures at Bellingham, despite the fact that pipeline operators used in-line inspection tools ("pigs") to ensure the safety of their lines. The lines were all "smart pigged" with cur-rnrent magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tools for corrosion-an activity that went beyond even the current regulatory requirements imposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) Office of Pipeline Safety.
机译:尽管当今的在线检查设备可以有效地定位腐蚀和金属损失,但它们检测到管道故障(对管道外表面的机械损坏)的最重要先兆之一的能力受到限制。作为回应,GTI和美国运输部带头进行了数百万美元的努力,以开发先进的工具和技术来定位凿子,凹痕,碎屑和其他类型的异常。近年来,美国管道行业令人羡慕的安全记录已经被一些罕见,高度重要和广为人知的事件所破坏(Edison,NJ(1994))。弗吉尼亚州雷斯顿(1994);最近,华盛顿州贝灵汉(1999)。尽管管道运营商使用在线检查工具(“猪”)来确保管道安全,但在贝灵汉,这些管道故障中的最新事故还是造成了死亡。这些生产线全都配备了用于腐蚀的当前磁通量泄漏(MFL)检查工具进行“智能清管”,其活动甚至超出了美国运输部(DOT)管道安全办公室的现行法规要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pipeline & gas journal》 |2001年第6期|57-58|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 管道运输;煤炭气化工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号