首页> 外文期刊>Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy >An analysis of the ideological work of the discourses of ‘fair play’ and moral education in perpetuating inequitable gender practices in PETE
【24h】

An analysis of the ideological work of the discourses of ‘fair play’ and moral education in perpetuating inequitable gender practices in PETE

机译:分析“公平竞争”和道德教育的话语思想在使PETE中不平等的性别习俗永存的思想工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Physical education (PE) is a subject which has a long history of legitimising itself on the grounds of its contribution to pupils' social and moral welfare. It therefore seems probable that PE teacher education (PETE) might embrace recent calls for the need to re-moralise society due to the conditions of the late-modern age and not least the pleas for professional teachers to perceive their role within moral, as opposed to technical terms. It seems pertinent to ask whether PETE culture strives to nurture tomorrow's PE teachers within a philosophy which values inclusive, local learning environments which celebrate and respect the diversity of citizens in a democratic, late-modern society, even though it has traditionally been founded upon scientific functionalism and a positivistic pedagogy. Purpose: The study aimed to explore the extent to which PETE can be seen to nurture equitable learning environments, within a discourse of teacher professionalism which celebrates diversity, by using the lens of gender equity. Research design and data collection: Qualitative data have been generated from individual, in-depth interviews, group interviews and the content analysis of PETE curricula. The sample comprised eight PE teacher educators (two female, six male), 12 student teachers (three female, nine male), and five supervisory teachers (one female, four male) from three institutions of higher education offering PETE in Norway. Participants were asked questions such as ‘what do you see as being the most important knowledge in PETE?’, ‘how would you describe a good, professional PE teacher?’, ‘how do you interpret providing students with equitable learning experiences?’, ‘what type of gender theory informs your PETE practice?’, and ‘what does gender equity mean to you?’ Local policy documents were collected from each institution, including PETE course outlines, overviews of compulsory literature, and PETE evaluation procedures. A critical hermeneutical analysis of the data drawing upon a range of theoretical perspectives and research findings on gender, moral education through the physical, and teacher professionalism, was used to explore the overriding research question. Findings: The analyses revealed that the concept of ‘fair play’, combined with the prevailing gender discourses and dominant views of teacher professionalism in PETE, does considerable ‘ideological work’ to sustain inequitable gender relations. The discourse of ‘fair play’ draws upon actors' common sense understandings of the concept as opposed to theoretical perspectives, as does the hegemonic discourse of gender which is evident in the data. Rather than developing professional identities which celebrate diversity, PETE culture in Norway seems to continue a subject tradition of constructing teachers, student teachers and pupils as universal, disembodied, and de-contextualised subjects. Conclusions: The study alights us to the dangers of imposing ‘discursive closure’ if PETE culture legitimates discourses about gender and morality which limit actors' understandings of the complexities of these phenomena. We advocate a PETE culture that emphasises plurality and acknowledges the inevitable power structures imbued in different ways of knowing.View full textDownload full textKeywordsphysical education, moral education, gender, fair playRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.532781
机译:背景:体育是一门以其对学生的社会和道德福利的贡献为依据而使其自身合法化的悠久历史。因此,由于近代时代的条件,体育教师教育(PETE)似乎可能接受了最近的要求重新道德化的呼吁,尤其是对于专业教师的要求,他们认为自己在道德方面的作用与众不同技术术语。似乎有必要提出疑问,即PETE文化是否努力在一种重视包容性本地学习环境的哲学中努力培养明天的体育教师,这种学习环境庆祝并尊重民主,现代社会中公民的多样性,即使传统上它是建立在科学基础之上的。功能主义和实证主义教学法。目的:该研究旨在探索通过使用性别平等的视角,在庆祝多元性的教师专业化话语中,探讨PETE在多大程度上培育公平的学习环境。研究设计和数据收集:定性数据来自于个人,深入的访谈,小组访谈以及PETE课程的内容分析。样本包括来自挪威3个提供PETE的高等教育机构的8名体育教师教育者(2名女性,6名男性),12名学生教师(3名女性,9名男性)和5名监督教师(1名女性,4名男性)。与会者被问到以下问题:“您认为PETE中最重要的知识是什么?”,“您将如何形容一名优秀的专业体育老师?”,“您如何看待?解释为学生提供平等的学习经验?,“什么类型的性别理论指导您的PETE实践?”,“性别平等对您意味着什么?”地方政策文件收集自每个机构,包括PETE课程大纲,必修文献概述以及PETE评估程序。对数据的批判性诠释分析是基于对性别,通过体育的道德教育和教师专业精神的一系列理论观点和研究发现而得出的,用于探索最重要的研究问题。研究结果:分析显示,“公平竞争”的概念,结合PETE中流行的性别论述和教师专业精神的主流观点,为维持不平等的性别关系做了相当大的“意识形态工作”。 “公平竞争”的论述借鉴了行为者对概念的常识性理解,与理论观点相反,数据中的性别霸权主义论述也是如此。挪威的PETE文化似乎没有建立一种庆祝多元性的专业身份,而是继续秉承着将教师,学生教师和学生建构为普遍的,不具体的和去情境化的学科的学科传统。结论:该研究使我们意识到,如果PETE文化使关于性别和道德的话语合法化,这会限制行为者对这些现象的复杂性的理解,那么就有可能实施“话语关闭”。我们提倡一种PETE文化,该文化强调多元化,并承认以不同的认知方式施加的不可避免的权力结构。查看全文下载全文关键字体育,道德教育,性别,公平竞争“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.532781

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号