首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on science >Debate as Scientific Practice in Nineteenth-Century Paris: The Controversy Over the Microscope
【24h】

Debate as Scientific Practice in Nineteenth-Century Paris: The Controversy Over the Microscope

机译:在十九世纪的巴黎作为科学实践的辩论:关于显微镜的争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article explores debate as a key scientific practice among the medical elite in nineteenth-century Paris, with an emphasis on academic debate and debate in the scientific/medical press. I use the debate over the microscope, which took place in the Paris Academy of Medicine in 1854—55 and concurrently in the medical press, to illustrate the role of debate as scientific practice. Focusing on the debate in the press, I show how medical journalists used the debate in the Academy to raise larger questions about the nature of science and medicine and to legitimate French microscopy. I suggest that debate was an important scientific practice in nineteenth-century Paris, not only owing to a longstanding belief that truth emerges through disputation but also depending on and exemplifying a shared masculine culture of honor.
机译:本文将探讨辩论作为19世纪巴黎医学精英中的一项重要科学实践,重点是学术辩论和科学/医学出版社中的辩论。我使用显微镜的辩论(该辩论于1854年在巴黎医学院举行,当时是55岁,同时在医学出版社中进行)来说明辩论作为科学实践的作用。我着眼于新闻界的辩论,向我展示医学记者如何利用学院的辩论对科学和医学的性质以及合法的法国显微镜提出更大的疑问。我认为,辩论是19世纪巴黎的一项重要科学实践,这不仅是因为长期以来人们相信真理是通过争端产生的,而且还取决于并举例说明了一种共有的男性荣誉文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号