首页> 外文期刊>Packaging Technology and Science >Leakproofness of dangerous goods packagings-comparison of worst-case limit leakage rates and sensitivity of the bubble test
【24h】

Leakproofness of dangerous goods packagings-comparison of worst-case limit leakage rates and sensitivity of the bubble test

机译:危险货物包装的防漏性-最坏情况极限泄漏率的比较和气泡测试的灵敏度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work focuses on the question if the bubble test prescribed in the Dangerous Goods Regulations has sufficient sensitivity to detect leakage rates, which could result in the formation of explosive atmospheres during transport. The sensitivity of the bubble test is not directly comparable with other leak testing methods because of its different flow conditions. Therefore, a normalized minimum detectable leakage rate under Helium test conditions is calculated for the bubble test. This sensitivity of the bubble test under reference conditions is compared with limit leakage rates for a worst-case transport scenario. The sensitivity of the bubble test is not sufficient to prove the limit leakage rates for 6-L packagings. The formation of explosive vapour-air-mixtures cannot be excluded. Therefore, more sensitive leak testing methods should be considered for smaller packaging design types.
机译:这项工作着眼于以下问题:《危险品条例》中规定的气泡测试是否具有足够的灵敏度来检测泄漏率,泄漏率可能会导致在运输过程中形成爆炸性气氛。气泡测试的灵敏度因其流动条件不同而不能直接与其他泄漏测试方法相比。因此,针对气泡测试计算了在氦气测试条件下的标准化最小可检测泄漏率。在最坏情况下的运输情况下,将气泡测试在参考条件下的灵敏度与极限泄漏率进行比较。气泡测试的灵敏度不足以证明6升包装的极限泄漏率。爆炸性蒸气-空气混合物的形成不能排除。因此,对于较小的包装设计类型,应考虑使用更敏感的泄漏测试方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号