首页> 外文期刊>Organization Studies >Why Michels' 'iron law of oligarchy' is not an iron law - and how democratic organisations can stay 'oligarchy-free'
【24h】

Why Michels' 'iron law of oligarchy' is not an iron law - and how democratic organisations can stay 'oligarchy-free'

机译:为什么米歇尔斯的“寡头铁律”不是铁律-民主组织如何保持“无寡头”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

More than 100 years ago, Robert Michels laid out his theory of the 'iron law of oligarchy'. The main, and crucial, point Michels made is that oligarchy will always emerge; even in the case of genuine attempts to organise and run organisations in non-oligarchic or non-hierarchical ways, the iron law allegedly holds sway. This paper critically examines, and refutes, Michels' theory on theoretical and methodological grounds. It argues that his theory is in many ways insufficient and that his dictum of the unavoidability of oligarchisation is not as compelling and cogent as stereotypical references to it might imply. Moreover, the paper shows that alternative/democratic organisations actually have a whole range of means to avoid oligarchisation.
机译:一百多年前,罗伯特·米歇尔(Robert Michels)提出了他的“寡头铁定律”理论。米歇尔(Michels)提出的主要而关键的观点是寡头政治将永远出现。即使在真正尝试以非寡头或非等级的方式组织和运行组织的情况下,铁器法据称也可以控制。本文从理论和方法论的角度对米歇尔的理论进行了批判性的考察和反驳。它认为,他的理论在许多方面是不足的,而且他关于寡头化不可避免的观点并不像对它的陈规定型观念所暗示的那样具有说服力和说服力。此外,该论文表明,替代/民主组织实际上具有避免寡头化的各种手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号