首页> 外文期刊>Oral History Review, The >Interviewing the Interviewers: Difference, Knowledge Sharing, and Cohesion within the Queensland Speaks Interviewing Team
【24h】

Interviewing the Interviewers: Difference, Knowledge Sharing, and Cohesion within the Queensland Speaks Interviewing Team

机译:采访采访者:昆士兰州采访小组的差异,知识共享和凝聚力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Queensland Speaks oral history project sits at the crossroad between history and political science. The interview team comes from a range of professional backgrounds and career stages. Although guided by the overall goals of the project, the interviewers have considerable autonomy over whom they interview and the questions they ask. The implications of this flexible approach for the overall cohesion of the project provided the impetus for us to write this article. The literature on oral history and interviewing clarified a preexisting appreciation of the role of the interviewer in the outcomes of interviews, a situation that has particular implications for the Queensland Speaks oral history project in light of the above-mentioned autonomy. In this article, we draw on the literature relating to oral history and interviewing in order to explore how a coherent oral history project has emerged without the boundaries imposed by having a dominant research question and/or a team of interviewers originating from the same discipline. The experiences of the key interviewers were examined to establish likely influences on their interviewing skills and to investigate the differences across the team. We also wanted to gain an understanding of how each individual conceptualized the project. After conducting these interviews with the team and listening to interviews that they had already conducted for the Queensland Speaks project, we found that each interviewer did bring his or her own style and research interests to bear. Even so, the differences between their individual approaches and the subsequent interview outcomes were not as great as we had anticipated, and we found that extensive research undertaken by the less experienced members of the team acted to balance existing knowledge and skill gaps between the early career researchers and those interviewers who are either former Queensland public servants themselves and/or have extensive knowledge of Queensland political history. Through informal communication and teamwork, a high degree of cohesion within the Queensland Speaks interviewing team has emerged.
机译:昆士兰讲口述历史项目位于历史与政治科学之间的十字路口。面试团队来自不同的专业背景和职业阶段。尽管以项目的总体目标为指导,但访问员在采访对象和提出的问题上拥有很大的自主权。这种灵活方法对项目整体凝聚力的影响为我们撰写本文提供了动力。有关口述历史和面试的文献阐明了对面试官在面试结果中所起的作用的预先认识,鉴于上述自主性,这种情况对昆士兰口语口述历史项目具有特殊意义。在本文中,我们将参考与口述历史和访谈相关的文献,以探索如何在没有主导研究问题和/或来自同一学科的面试官团队强加界限的情况下出现连贯的口述历史计划。对主要面试官的经验进行了检查,以建立可能影响他们的面试技能并调查整个团队之间的差异的方法。我们还想了解每个人如何将项目概念化。在与团队进行了这些访谈并听取了他们已经为昆士兰演讲项目进行的访谈之后,我们发现每个访谈者的确具有自己的风格和研究兴趣。即便如此,他们的个人方法与随后的面试结果之间的差异并没有我们预期的那么大,我们发现,由经验不足的团队成员进行的广泛研究可以平衡早期职业之间的现有知识和技能差距研究人员和采访者都是昆士兰州以前的公务员,并且/或者对昆士兰州的政治历史有广泛的了解。通过非正式的沟通和团队合作,昆士兰演讲中心的采访团队已形成高度凝聚力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号