首页> 外文期刊>Online >FRONT Lines
【24h】

FRONT Lines

机译:前线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

LIBRARIES ARE CONSTANTLY under the gun to prove they are worth the money their parent organizations spend to maintain services and pay staff. As information becomes ever more accessible, the notion that libraries, and by extension, the librarians who staff them, are obsolete appears more frequently. One answer has been for librarians to drop the "L" word from their titles, becoming information specialists, taxonomists, research associates, information analysts, scholarly communication consultants, or some other non-L title. That, however, is a cosmetic change. I think the real issue with value propositions for information professionals is invisibility. Our resources are increasingly in electronic form, and thus invisible. No one walks into a room and sees actual databases, ebooks, or websites. These may show up on a screen-maybe a phone, a laptop, or some other device-but people have to know the resources are there, click on an icon, or use them regularly. It's a different experience from that of physical books sitting on shelves. Electronic resources are largely invisible.
机译:图书馆一直在证明自己是值得的,其上级组织用于维护服务和支付员工的钱是值得的。随着信息的获取变得越来越容易,关于图书馆的概念以及作为扩展对象的图书馆员已经过时了。答案是让图书馆员从他们的头衔中删除“ L”一词,成为信息专家,分类学家,研究助理,信息分析师,学术交流顾问或其他一些非L头衔。但是,那是表面上的改变。我认为对于信息专业人员而言,价值主张的真正问题是隐形。我们的资源越来越以电子形式出现,因此是无形的。没有人走进一个房间,看到实际的数据库,电子书或网站。这些可能会显示在屏幕上-可能是电话,笔记本电脑或其他设备-但人们必须知道那里的资源,单击图标或定期使用它们。这与坐在书架上的实体书的体验不同。电子资源在很大程度上是看不见的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Online》 |2020年第2期|4-4|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号