首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Engineering and Design >Comparison and analysis of different selection strategies of genetic algorithms for fuel reloading optimization of Thorium-based HTGRs
【24h】

Comparison and analysis of different selection strategies of genetic algorithms for fuel reloading optimization of Thorium-based HTGRs

机译:遗传算法不同选择策略的比较与分析钍基HTGR的燃料重新加载优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nuclear fuel cycle cost can be effectively reduced through fuel reloading optimization. Genetic algorithm (GA) is a classic optimization algorithm that is widely applied in fuel reloading optimization. In the GA, selection is a key operator. However, few studies have compared and analyzed different selection strategies. In this study, 1/6 core of thorium-based block-type high temperature gas-cooled reactor was considered as an example, and ten different selection strategies were compared and analyzed. Five of these strategies were the roulette wheel and proportionate selection, tournament selection, uniform sorting, exponential sorting, and deterministic selection, whereas the other five were the aforementioned selection strategies combined with the truncation selection strategy. These ten different selection strategies were evaluated for single-objective and multi-objective problems. In single-objective optimization problems, the effective neutron multiplication factor was selected as the only optimization objective, whereas in multi-objective optimization problems, the effective neutron multiplication factor and power peak factor were considered as optimization objectives. The results indicated that exponential sorting was the best selection strategy for single-objective optimization problems, whereas hybrid truncation exponential sorting was the best selection strategy for multi-objective optimization problems.
机译:通过燃料重新加载优化可以有效地降低核燃料循环成本。遗传算法(GA)是一种经典优化算法,广泛应用于燃料重新加载优化。在GA中,选择是关键操作员。然而,很少的研究已经进行了比较和分析了不同的选择策略。在本研究中,考虑了基于钍的嵌段型高温气体冷却反应器的1/6核,并将其进行了比较和分析了十种不同的选择策略。这些策略中的五个是轮盘赌和比例选择,锦标赛选择,均匀分类,指数排序和确定性选择,而另外五个是上述选择策略与截断选择策略相结合。评估了这十种不同的选择策略,用于单目标和多目标问题。在单目标优化问题中,选择有效的中子倍增因子作为唯一的优化目标,而在多目标优化问题中,有效的中子倍增因子和功率峰值因子被认为是优化目标。结果表明,指数排序是单目标优化问题的最佳选择策略,而混合截断指数排序是多目标优化问题的最佳选择策略。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号