首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >The great Mexican maize scandal
【24h】

The great Mexican maize scandal

机译:墨西哥玉米大丑闻

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For environmentalists, the work was proof of the dangers of genetic modification. Transgenes had spread to traditional maize varieties grown in Mexico. Then the journal Nature disowned the research paper, prompting claims that it had given in to a campaign orchestrated by the biotech industry. But why were the authors' strongest critics their own colleagues? Here, we reveal the extraordinary goings-on behind the headlines. And on p 17 we ask if such genetic pollution really matters. The saga began in September 2001. The Mexican environment ministry announced that DNA from genetically modified maize had been found in native varieties grown on small farms. The results were, not surprisingly, seized upon by campaigners opposed to GM crops. And in November, they were given more ammunition when the findings were published in the prestigious journal Nature. Then, this April, things took a confusing turn. In an unprecedented move, Nature declared that it regretted publishing the paper, and ran two letters that claimed the research was fatally flawed.
机译:对于环保主义者来说,这项工作证明了基因改造的危险。转基因已传播到墨西哥种植的传统玉米品种。然后,《自然》(Nature)杂志取消了该研究论文,提出了它被生物技术行业精心策划的一项运动的主张。但是,为什么作者最有力的批评家是他们自己的同事呢?在这里,我们揭示了标题背后的非凡事件。在第17页,我们问这种遗传污染是否真的重要。传奇始于2001年9月。墨西哥环境部宣布,在小型农场种植的本地品种中发现了转基因玉米的DNA。毫不奇怪,反对转基因作物的运动家抓住了这一结果。到了11月,当研究结果发表在著名的《自然》杂志上时,他们得到了更多的弹药。然后,今年四月,情况发生了混乱。 《自然》杂志以前所未有的举动宣布,它后悔发表该论文,并发表了两封信,声称该研究存在致命缺陷。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2002年第2347期|p.14-16|共3页
  • 作者

    Fred Pearce;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号