首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >What are we waiting for?
【24h】

What are we waiting for?

机译:我们还在等什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

WOULD you jump off a skyscraper? What if someone told you that physicists still don't fully understand gravity: would you risk it then? We still have a lot to learn about gravity, but that doesn't make jumping off a skyscraper a good idea. Similarly, we still have a lot to learn about the climate but that doesn't make pumping ever more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere a good idea. Uncertainty is one of the defining features of science. Absolute proof exists only in mathematics. In the real world, it is impossible to prove that scientific theories are right in every circumstance; we can only prove that they are wrong. This provisionality can cause people to lose faith in the conclusions of science, but it shouldn't. The recent history of science is not one of well-established theories being proven wrong. Rather, it is of theories being gradually refined. Newton's laws of gravity may have been superseded, but they are still accurate enough to be used for manv purposes.
机译:你会跳下摩天大楼吗?如果有人告诉你物理学家仍然不完全了解重力怎么办:那你会冒险吗?关于重力,我们还有很多要学习的知识,但这并不能使跳出摩天大楼成为一个好主意。同样,我们仍然需要了解很多有关气候的知识,但这并不能使向大气中排放更多的温室气体成为一个好主意。不确定性是科学的定义特征之一。绝对证明仅存在于数学中。在现实世界中,不可能证明在任何情况下科学理论都是正确的。我们只能证明他们错了。这种暂时性可能使人们对科学结论失去信心,但事实并非如此。最近的科学史并不是公认的错误理论之一。相反,它的理论正在逐步完善。牛顿的重力定律可能已经被取代,但是它们仍然足够精确,可以用于人工操作。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2011年第2835期|p.5|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号