首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >Legitimation and Accumulation in Climate Change Governance
【24h】

Legitimation and Accumulation in Climate Change Governance

机译:气候变化治理中的合法性和累积性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent debates have drawn attention to the legitimacy challenges faced by new forms of global governance. Privatised governance in particular has come under considerable scrutiny. This paper attempts to contribute to this debate through an analysis of the widespread critiques of climate governance that focus on its ‘marketized’ or ‘privatized’ character. Such critiques fundamentally attempt to delegitimise dominant governance mechanisms which can be collectively known as the ‘global carbon market’. The paper argues that to understand the political dynamics of legitimacy surrounding these forms of governance we need to take into account the recurrent tension within capitalism between accumulation and legitimation. This focus enables us to understand the legitimacy problems surrounding climate governance. First, it draws attention to the character of the discourses which are critical of marketized climate governance, which attack it precisely because of the forms of accumulation it enables. Second, many of these governance projects have themselves been developed in part precisely in order to overcome legitimacy crises inherent in capital accumulation, and specifically in the current context in relation to the dominance of finance within contemporary capitalism. Finally, it suggests that one of the strategies of firms involved in such governance is to attempt to overcome this legitimacy-accumulation tension in the way that automobility did in the Fordist era. Climate governance practices should be understood as a pursuit of this sort of coherence which might give rise to an ‘ecological regime of accumulation’ that aims to forestall more radical critiques that argue that capitalism and sustainability are inimical.View full textDownload full textKeywordsclimate change, private governance, legitimacy, accumulation, carbon marketsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563460903288247
机译:最近的辩论引起了人们对新形式的全球治理所面临的合法性挑战的关注。特别是私有化的治理受到了严格的审查。本文试图通过分析针对气候治理的广泛批评,以其“市场化”或“私有化”为特征,从而为这一辩论做出贡献。这种批评从根本上试图使主导性的治理机制合法化,这些机制可以被统称为“全球碳市场”。本文认为,要了解围绕这些治理形式的合法性的政治动态,我们需要考虑到积累和合法化之间资本主义内部的反复紧张。这种关注使我们能够了解围绕气候治理的合法性问题。首先,它提请人们注意那些对市场化气候治理至关重要的话语的特征,正是由于其促成的积累形式而对它进行攻击。其次,许多治理项目本身的开发,部分是为了克服资本积累所固有的合法性危机,特别是在当前背景下,与当代资本主义中金融主导地位有关的危机。最后,它表明,参与这种治理的公司的策略之一就是试图以福特汽车时代的自动驾驶方式克服这种合法性-积累的张力。应该将气候治理实践理解为对这种一致性的追求,这可能会导致形成一种“生态积累制度”,旨在阻止更为激进的批评,这些批评认为资本主义和可持续性是有害的。查看全文下载全文下载关键词变化,私人治理,合法性,积累,碳市场相关的变量add add_id pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563460903288247

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号