...
首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >Normative Power Europe and the Moral Economy of Africa-EU Ties: A Conceptual Reorientation of ‘Normative Power’
【24h】

Normative Power Europe and the Moral Economy of Africa-EU Ties: A Conceptual Reorientation of ‘Normative Power’

机译:欧洲规范权力与非洲道德经济-欧盟纽带:“规范权力”的概念重新定位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

‘Normative power’ is an increasingly popularised concept in the study of EU external relations in fields including military policy, human rights, and international trade. Defined by Manners, it acknowledges the normative foundations of the European project, examines how Europe acts to (re)shape internationally accepted norms, and makes the claim that Europe ought to influence external partners' conception of ‘normal’ behaviour in pursuit of a just global order. This article, however, argues that a moral economy perspective is central to a critical reorientation of the concept of normative power towards appraisal of discrepancies between nominal EU norms and material EU policy outcomes. Examining Europe's ‘normative power’ in its relations with the African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries, it demonstrates how a moral economy of ACP-EU ties has been instituted in negotiation with European ethical norms as to solidarity with ‘the poor’. Nevertheless, the moral economy of ACP-EU ties is seen not to be ‘moral’ in terms of outcomes for vulnerable citizens in ACP countries. Rather the embedding of moral norms concerning pro-poor ‘development’ has rationalised asymmetric economic ties. ‘Normative power’ is understood as the EU's utilisation of moral norms in the public legitimisation and self-rationalisation of geopolitical interest and commercial gain in its relations with external ‘partners’.View full textDownload full textKeywordsEU, ACP states, trade, development, moral political economy, moral economy, EPAs, normative power, Cotonou AgreementRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.562975
机译:“规范权力”是在军事政策,人权和国际贸易等领域的欧盟对外关系研究中日益普及的概念。它由Manners定义,它承认欧洲项目的规范基础,研究了欧洲如何行动(重塑)国际公认的规范,并声称欧洲应该在追求中影响外部合作伙伴的“正常”行为概念。公正的全球秩序。但是,本文认为,道德经济学的观点对于规范性权力的概念进行重新定位以评估名义欧盟规范与实质性欧盟政策成果之间的差异至关重要。考察了欧洲与非洲,加勒比海和太平洋(ACP)国家的关系中的“规范力量”,它表明了如何与欧洲的道德规范进行谈判以建立ACP-EU关系的道德经济学, “穷人”。然而,就非加太国家弱势公民的成果而言,非加太国家与欧盟关系的道德经济被认为不是“道德”的。相反,关于扶贫“发展”的道德规范的嵌入合理化了不对称的经济联系。 “规范权力”被理解为欧盟在与外部“合作伙伴”的关系中,在对地缘政治利益和商业利益的公共合法化和自我合理化中利用道德规范。查看全文下载全文关键词,贸易,发展,道德政治经济学,道德经济,EPA,规范性权力,科托努协议相关var addthis_config = { ,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.562975

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号