首页> 外文期刊>New library world >Where's the bio? Databases, Wikipedia, and the web
【24h】

Where's the bio? Databases, Wikipedia, and the web

机译:生物在哪里?数据库,维基百科和网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to compare biographical content for literary authors writing in English among Biography Reference Bank, Contemporary Authors Online, Wikipedia, and the web. Design/methodology/approach - A sample of 500 names was gathered from curricula and textbooks used in English courses and searched in the Contemporary Authors Online portion of Literature Resource Center, Biography Reference Bank, Wikipedia, and the web; the results and content were compared. Findings - Each source has core content plus its own unique offerings and specific challenges, as evidenced in searching, evaluative techniques such as authority and currency, and content. Research limitations/implications - This study can only offer a small part of the picture of what information resides where and a single snapshot in time. Practical implications - This study will help librarians decide whether to subscribe to a biographical database. It also reinforces the need for evidence-based practice in Hbrarianship. Originality/value - While the study is only a small part of the picture, it still makes use of a significant sample size to validate/refute assumptions about the availability of biographical information and the sources studied.
机译:目的-本文旨在比较传记参考库,在线当代作者,维基百科和网络之间文学作者的传记内容。设计/方法/方法-从英语课程中使用的课程和教科书中收集了500个名称的样本,并在文献资源中心,传记参考银行,维基百科和网络上的“当代在线作者”部分中进行了搜索;比较结果和内容。调查结果-每个资源都有核心内容,还有自己独特的产品和特定的挑战,如搜索,权威性和货币性等评估技术以及内容所证明的。研究局限性/含义-这项研究只能提供一小部分信息所在的图片,并且只能提供一个时间快照。实际意义-这项研究将帮助图书馆员决定是否订阅传记数据库。它还加强了在管理方面基于证据的实践的需求。原创性/价值-尽管研究只是图片的一小部分,但它仍然利用大量样本来验证/驳斥有关传记信息和研究来源的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号