首页> 外文期刊>New library world >UContent: The Information Professional's Guide to User-Generated Content
【24h】

UContent: The Information Professional's Guide to User-Generated Content

机译:UContent:用户生成内容的《信息专业人员指南》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this whizzy all-singing, all-dancing cyberworld that the modern LIS practitioner now inhabits new terms, concepts and systems are spewed forth relentlessly -cybercartography, flickr, Yahoo Pipes. Social tagging, self-publishing-the list seems endless and mutates constantly. Sisyphus would feel at home here. To try to deal with this flood (in typical American breezy style) the author takes the encompassing theme of "User Generated Content" and produces a helpful-if rather dense-book on this whole rapidly evolving topic-a state of the art handbook in essence. Key questions always asked of the information in the internet are "credibility" and "authority"-can User Generated Content have any credibility or be taken seriously when every Tom, Dick and Harry can get his sage comments (or obsessive ravings) on the web? The furore over Wikipedia entries and TripAdvisor Reviews seem to buttress the scepticism of many readers about the value and currency of such sites.
机译:现代LIS从业人员现在习惯于使用这种新词,全舞的网络​​世界,不断涌现新术语,新概念和新系统-网络制图,flickr和Yahoo Pipes。社交标签,自发布列表似乎无穷无尽,并且不断变化。西西弗斯(Sisyphus)在这里会感到宾至如归。为了尝试应对这种洪水(典型的美国轻风),作者采用了“用户生成的内容”这一涵盖主题,并针对整个快速发展的主题编写了一本很有帮助的书(如果是相当密集的书),则是一本最新的手册。本质。互联网上经常问到的信息的关键问题是“可信度”和“权威性”-当每个汤姆,迪克和哈里都能在网络上获得其圣人评论(或痴迷的狂欢)时,用户生成的内容是否具有可信度或受到重视?维基百科条目和TripAdvisor评论的愤怒似乎支持了许多读者对此类网站的价值和货币的怀疑。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New library world》 |2013年第8期|360-360|共1页
  • 作者

    Mike Freeman;

  • 作者单位

    West Midlands CHIP, Coventry, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号