首页> 外文期刊>Neohelicon >The “gaps” of the western mind and modern poetics
【24h】

The “gaps” of the western mind and modern poetics

机译:西方思维与现代诗学的“差距”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As early as at the beginning of the nineteenth century western philosophy in general and the work of Schopenhauer in particular indicated the need to assimilate the results of eastern thinking into western philosophy. Although the most important philosophers of the first half of the twentieth century did not choose to continue to proceed accordingly, the representatives of natural sciences and poetry were all the more eager to elaborate on the new insight. Among them the physicist Erwin Schrödinger engaged in a systematic assessment of the European philosophical traditions and realised that there are “gaps” (“die Lücken, welche die Verständlichkeitsannahme lässt“) in the causal, i.e., cause and effect patterns of the European mind. He experienced this as a crisis of the western thinking and its attempted objectivity, and stressed the need for a “Blutmischung mit dem Osten”. Schrödinger undertook the exploration of the above problem not as a philosopher or a philologist, but as an assessor of the consequences of the scientific findings of his age. His aim was to call attention to the antinomies underlying the history of the European mind. Regarding poetics, the question arises how define the poet’s space in this system, and where is the creator within creation? Not only did a physicist meditate on this complex subject but contemporary poets were also challenged by its implications, and my paper aims to inquire into their efforts. In my view the forms evolving in 19–20th century modernity mark the stages of becoming conscious of the “gaps” discovered in the western mind. Departing from Schrödinger’s idea, in the following I attempt to identify poetic resolutions which be compared to the question the physicist raised. They will mark borderline situations, since through the dialogical quality of modernity they point toward the evolution of the synthetic mode.
机译:早在19世纪初期,西方哲学总体上,特别是叔本华的著作就表明有必要将东方思想的结果吸收到西方哲学中。尽管二十世纪上半叶最重要的哲学家没有选择继续进行相应的研究,但是自然科学和诗歌的代表更渴望阐述新的见解。其中,物理学家欧文·施罗丁格(ErwinSchrödinger)致力于对欧洲哲学传统进行系统的评估,并意识到因果关系即欧洲思维的因果模式存在“空白”(“ DieLücken,welche dieVerständlichkeitsannahmelässt”)。他将这种经历看作是西方思维及其尝试的客观性的危机,并强调需要“ Bostmischung mit dem Osten”。 Schrödinger并非以哲学家或语言学家的身份来探索上述问题,而是以评估者的身份评估了他那个时代的科学发现。他的目的是引起人们注意欧洲思想史的基础。关于诗学,出现了一个问题,即如何在该系统中定义诗人的空间,以及创作者在创作中位于何处?物理学家不仅思考了这个复杂的主题,而且当代诗人也受到其含义的挑战,而我的论文旨在探究他们的努力。在我看来,19-20世纪现代性演变的形式标志着意识到西方思想中发现的“差距”的阶段。在下文中,与薛定er的观点不同,我试图找出与物理学家提出的问题相比较的诗意解决方案。它们将标志着边界情况,因为通过现代性的对话品质,它们指向了合成模式的演变。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Neohelicon》 |2007年第1期|145-194|共50页
  • 作者

    Lóránt Kabdebó;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Arts, University of Miskolc, H-3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号