首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Bigger isn't always better
【24h】

Bigger isn't always better

机译:更大并不总是更好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his heyday in the 1960s and 1970s, James Black demonstrated a Midas touch that turned base chemicals into pharmaceutical gold. An old-fashioned British pharmacologist who would think through his experiments for weeks before picking up a pipette, Black passionately believed in his duty to help cure disease―and in the capability of drug companies to help him do so. After leaving academia for ICI, he developed beta-blockers to treat hypertension. Later, working for Smith, Kline & French, his work on histamine H2-receptor blockers revolutionized the treatment of stomach ulcers. Black's contribution to medicine was honoured with a Nobel Prize in 1988, and these two classes of drug are still bestsellers. What wouldn't the world's pharmaceutical giants give for a return to the days when the steady arrival of new blockbuster drugs saw the industry riding high? Today it's a different story. The patents are running out on established earners and, despite the billions of dollars that the firms are pouring into research and development, the number of new drugs launched each year is falling. At the same time, the average cost of bringing a drug to market is rising, having doubled over the past 15 years; it now stands at as much as US$800 million, according to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development in Boston. Put these two trends together, and it is easy to see why analysts are warning that historical patterns of profit growth are unlikely to continue. Factor in the threat of a big earner being blown away by a successful patent challenge―as happened to GlaxoSmithKline's antibiotic Augmentin earlier this year―and things look bleak indeed.
机译:在1960年代和1970年代的鼎盛时期,詹姆斯·布莱克(James Black)展示了麦达斯(Midas)风格,将基础化学品转变为制药黄金。一位老式的英国药理学家会在拿起移液器之前经过数周的实验来思考,布莱克满怀信心地相信他的职责是帮助治愈疾病,并相信制药公司有能力帮助他做到这一点。在离开学术界参加ICI之后,他开发了β受体阻滞剂来治疗高血压。后来,他在Smith,Kline和French公司工作,研究组胺H2受体阻滞剂,彻底改变了胃溃疡的治疗方法。布莱克在医学上的贡献获得了1988年诺贝尔奖,而这两类药物仍然是畅销书。当新的重磅炸弹药物的不断涌入使整个行业飞速发展的时候,世界制药业巨头又有什么回报?今天,这是一个不同的故事。专利已经在既定的盈利者身上用尽了,尽管这些公司投入了数十亿美元进行研发,但每年推出的新药数量却在下降。同时,将药物推向市场的平均成本正在上升,在过去15年中翻了一番;根据波士顿塔夫茨大学药物研发研究中心的数据,目前这一数字高达8亿美元。将这两种趋势放在一起,很容易理解为什么分析师警告利润增长的历史模式不太可能继续。诸如葛兰素史克(GlaxoSmithKline)的抗生素Augmentin在今年早些时候发生的专利挑战,使一个大赚钱者受到威胁的危险因素,而且看起来确实令人沮丧。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2002年第6896期|p.353|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号